The days of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) control of indoctrination, propaganda and the media are long gone, but that does not mean that the KMT does not keep influencing Taiwanese voters. Witness Taiwan’s last presidential election, where many sheep-like voters were led to believe that Taiwan’s main problem was its economy and that former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was solely responsible for holding it back.
Some call this response a case of Stockholm Syndrome exhibited through a misguided loyalty resulting from Taiwanese being held hostage for 50 years by KMT one-party rule and indoctrination. Another and simpler explanation is that voters simply failed to do their homework.
At election time, the constant refrain and mantra in Taiwan was: “Our economy is so bad, we need a change.” In reality, with a growth rate of more than 5 percent, Taiwan’s economy was doing much better compared with many other places — and this is where voters first failed at doing their homework. So it was easy for them to be set up by the KMT’s ace flimflam man, Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who convinced them to vote for him. Ma promised he would lead Taiwan to catch up with or come closer to the inflated numbers of the People’s Republic of China.
Ma was elected and the corner was supposedly turned. Taiwan was well on its way to the Promised Land. Unfortunately, the TAIEX and economy are immune to flimflam and the economy nosedived. Some began to see the light, but others still listened to the flimflam man. The argument now changed. Before the election, even though the world economy was bad and Taiwan’s economy was fair, it was not a global problem; it was Chen’s fault. When, after the election, Taiwan suddenly discovered that the world economy had been bad all along and when Taiwan’s economy became worse, this was not Ma’s fault, it was a global problem. Logic? No, but that also is not a strong point of many Taiwanese voters.
There were some who sought to defend their choice to vote for Ma; they countered that the real election issue was corruption in Chen’s family, corruption that seemed to be a problem that only afflicted the Democratic Progressive Party. Ma, after all, had been acquitted of corruption. But wait; let’s go back to logic again. After appeals, Ma’s secretary was thrown into jail for misuse of state funds, but it was Ma’s bank account that had increased by more than half a million US dollars.
Wouldn’t one think that the Harvard-educated Ma would ask where that extra half a million in his account came from? Is that not logical?
Further, why would Ma’s secretary go out of his way to cheat people out of half a million dollars and put it in Ma’s bank account? Is that logical? Is it devotion? Or is it simply taking the fall? Still, for Ma’s staunch supporters, the flimflam man was pure as snow.
Let us return to Taiwan’s tanking economy. The ball remains in Ma’s court, so what is he doing? Desperate times call for desperate measures. However, it is not Taiwan’s economy that is really most desperate right now.
What is desperate is Ma’s reputation. His 6-3-3 campaign promise has for all practical purposes been jettisoned barely a month after election. Politicians are generally not expected to be held totally accountable for everything they promise before elections, but bailing out after one month is a bit too soon. This has left Ma with only one card left in his hand: to stake everything on direct links and tourists from China — and do it fast. So with little forethought and hardly a glance at the big picture, Ma has plunged ahead and ignored the risks to the people, the nation and the economy.
The first group of tourists has come with not too much trouble, but there is one hitch: Beijing has demanded that it do the screening and only allowed 1,000 people to visit a day, rather than 3,000. Even 3,000 tourists had raised questions as to whether it would help the economy, but 1,000? It will take a lot of flimflam to make that plausible.
In the meantime, what risks are involved? Health is a big one. The first wave of Chinese tourists was made of wealthy and healthy individuals, but has anyone done their homework on what can happen when the creme de la creme of China have come and gone, only to be replaced by the average Chinese tourist? Does anyone recall when Hong Kong opened up its Disneyland to average Chinese tourists? Not a pretty picture, but homework is a bit too hard, let’s trust the flimflam man.
What other things have been sacrificed with all this focus on getting some people from China here? First, the Taiwanese president who before the election said he would staunchly defend Taiwan’s sovereignty now says he does not mind being called “Mr Ma” rather than “President Ma” by the Chinese — which doesn’t have much of a sovereign ring to it. Could tourism be used as a cover to bring in spies and military personnel from China? Don’t even ask.
And the other matters of state? They seem to be sliding. When he was elected, his Cabinet members were sometimes referred to as the “Boy Scouts” because of their lack of previous experience. On paper, Ma’s team had better credentials, but in the first month or so, their performance has been more like “Cub Scouts” than Boy Scouts. Ma’s main focus seems to be only on not offending China.
The Diaoyutai (釣魚台) islands fiasco led to posturing about threatening war with Japan, a long-time ally and one of the best sources of tourism to Taiwan. That certainly will not help the economy. The Suao freeway and the environment? The Cabinet missed the mark on that one too.
Ma’s nominees to the Control Yuan and other positions? Shot down by his own party. So who’s in charge?
Then there was the cry that Taiwan’s airports were not up to snuff for the Chinese tourists and that the infrastructure has been let to stagnate. Taipei’s Songshan Airport in particular was singled out as not being ready. Did anyone do his homework on who the mayors of Taipei have been for the past 10 years? Who was in charge and let this slip? Flimflammed again.
Taiwan is not done; in addition to flimflam, the voters are being set up for the fluff that will follow. Now that we have a new administration, we are going to get pandas. It’s homework time again. Pandas may be cute, but they are fluff; not only are they fluff, but they are expensive fluff. They come with an expensive rental price tag that no one talks about. China rents them out at millions of dollars a year, plus they need an expensive environment and care. Whose tax dollars will be put into that economy?
The argument will come and had been used by several zoos around the world, that the zoo attendance will shoot up and people will spend money on T-shirts, stuffed pandas made in China and so on. Yes, it is true attendance usually goes up for the first year or two. But then what? Continue with your homework and see how many zoos buckle under the long-term costs. And the rental fee? China might waive that if Taiwan admits it is a province of China. Yet in preparation, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a KMT member, has already made a trip to Shanghai on taxpayers’ money to work out an exchange between Taiwan’s orangutans and gibbons and China’s golden monkeys.
Hopefully their monkeys will spend more dollars here than our gibbons will in China.
Flimflam and fluff, you get what you vote for. If Taiwan loses its sovereignty, health and dignity in the process, well at least Ma did keep one campaign promise.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
RSS