When the Beijing Olympics open in August, to a heady mixture of sporting celebration and political controversy, music will play a huge part in reinforcing the image and message of the Games. The opening will feature a program of world music, including a new work by Giorgio Moroder. Award ceremonies will feature national anthems, athletes will use music as a legal stimulant and motivational aid and for events such as synchronized swimming, music will of course be integral.
A cultural Olympiad for the 2012 London games is already the subject of much debate. But music has always played an important role in the event. In ancient Greece, singers received laurels for hymns composed for the various ceremonies, such as the elaborate sacrifice to Zeus. Athletes would be summoned by trumpets, while flautists accompanied the pentathlon. According to Baron Pierre de Coubertin, the Parisian aesthete who at the turn of the 20th century revived the games for a modern world: “The arts, in harmonious combination with sports, made the Olympic games great.”
Coubertin believed sport and the arts had become artificially separated. He wanted to integrate music into the competition itself. The 1912 Stockholm Olympics were thus the first to include a “pentathlon of the muses”: competitions for music, literature, painting, sculpture and architecture. Coubertin entered the literature contest under a pseudonym, winning gold with his inflated Ode to Sport — “O Sport, delight of the Gods, distillation of life!” Meanwhile, Italy’s now-forgotten Ricardo Barthelemy snatched the music gold with his Triumphal Olympic March. No silver or bronze medals were awarded.
This meanness on the part of the judges became a feature of the music Olympics over the coming years. Competitors were urged by Coubertin to “study the main rhythms of athletics.”
But few, it would seem, succeeded. Another problem was that composers of stature preferred to sit on the judging panel rather than risk denting their reputations by winning an ignominious bronze, should one be deemed worth giving. Worse still was the prospect of an “honorable mention.”
At the Paris Olympiad in 1924, a vast panel of 43 judges — including Vincent D’Indy, Igor Stravinsky, Bela Bartok and Mauric Ravel — failed to reach a decision. Four years later, a measly bronze was awarded to Denmark’s Rudolf Simonsen for his Hellas Symphony. In 1932, the single award of a silver medal damned with faint praise the most eminent of all Olympic music competitors, the Czech composer Josef Suk, for his patriotic march, Into a New Life.
At the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, new categories were introduced: orchestral compositions, instrumental music, solo and choral works. The judges, predominantly German, were particularly generous to native entrants. Werner Egk won gold for his orchestral work Olympische Festmusik, while all three medals in the choral category went to host nationals — thus proving the musical superiority of the master race.
The Nazis also pulled off a coup by commissioning Richard Strauss to write a work for the opening ceremony. After an oration by the Fuhrer, a cannon salute and the release of thousands of white pigeons, Strauss led the Berlin Philharmonic and the National Socialist Symphony Orchestra through his rousing Olympic Hymn.
He was far from enthusiastic about writing “sports music.”
In a letter to the writer Stefan Zweig, he said: “I am whiling away the dull days of advent by composing an Olympic Hymn for the plebs — I of all people, who despise sports.”
The 1948 games, hastily convened in war-torn London, opened with a performance of an ode by Roger Quilter and saw the Polish composer Zbigniew Turski take gold for his Olympic Symphony. Coubertin would have glowed at the presence of Micheline Ostermeyer, the remarkable Frenchwoman who won gold in both shot-put and discus, as well as bronze in the high jump. She celebrated her shot-put victory by giving an impromptu Beethoven recital at the French team headquarters.
“Sport,” she said, “taught me to relax; the piano gave me strong biceps and a sense of motion and rhythm.”
In 1950, she retired from athletics to resume her career as a concert pianist.
The 1948 games saw the end of the Olympic arts competitions, due to the growing difficulty of proving the amateur status of participants, but they had fulfilled Coubertin’s ambition of enshrining music in Olympic culture.
As Beijing will show, many types of music play a part — but it is classical music that has traditionally set the Olympics apart from what Coubertin called “plain sporting championships.”
John Williams, the US film score composer, wrote for the 1984, 1988 and 1996 Olympics.
He explained the attraction of the games thus: “The inspiration comes from the mythological idea we all seem to feel. It’s about deities and heroes that lived up in the mountain somewhere, that could do something we couldn’t do.”
Although Coubertin’s view of the Olympics now rings a little hollow, as drug-taking and commercialism threaten to consume today’s games, he would doubtless have approved of Williams’ lofty sentiments.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations