Engulfed in a string of alleged irregularities over its procurement plans and construction projects, the 2010 Taipei International Flora Expo has seemingly become the Taipei City Government’s “Secret Garden,” blooming with dubious buds which have provided daily ammunition for the opposition’s criticism of what it sees as the city government’s incompetence and lack of integrity.
The daily bombardment from Democratic Progressive Party Taipei City councilors appears all too much for the city government to bear, as is evident by the latest move being considered by the city government: A plan to designate the expo sites as restricted areas.
On Monday night, the city government’s Public Works Bureau proposed a regulation aiming at banning city councilors and the press from entering expo sites without prior approval from the expo’s organizing committee. The city government argued that the draft regulation had been prompted by concerns over individuals’ safety at the construction sites, given that the various projects are due to be completed soon. Taipei Deputy Mayor Lin Chien-yuan (林建元) added that the planned regulation could also prevent classified information about the expo’s exhibitions from being leaked.
Lin’s remarks prompted an immediate question in return: What classified information would there be within the flora expo’s exhibitions? Judging by recent developments and the various controversies surrounding the expo, such as overpriced flower procurements and alleged inflated price tags for various exhibition items and construction materials, it appears to many that if there is indeed any classified information concerning the expo, it would primarily concern how the city government spent the taxpayers’ money.
Instead, with its integrity in question and its reputation damaged, what the Taipei City Government needs to do is open its door wide to public scrutiny, rather than closing ranks and banning city councilors and the press from exercising their right to oversee municipal projects.
The latest move by the city government will remind many of its previous act of clearing away the homeless people who frequent the area near Longshan Temple (龍山寺) in the city’s Wanhua District (萬華). While the city government maintained this had nothing to do with the expo, but that it was meant only to keep a clear path for pedestrians, many find it unconvincing.
Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) has time and again touted the expo as a source of pride for Taipei residents — and of course everyone wants it to be a successful event that makes every Taiwanese proud. Sadly, the Hau administration’s handling of the expo so far has disappointed many, and the action of clearing away the homeless has already shamed the expo, with some comparing it to the notorious measures taken by Beijing authorities to chase away the homeless when it hosted the 2008 Olympics.
Hau is well advised to heed remarks by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) who, commenting on the string of controversies surrounding the expo and the Xinsheng Overpass construction project, rightly said: “Transparency is the best way out.”
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused