Joint naval exercises by US and South Korean forces, announced some time ago, are finally under way. The war games became a focus of attention even before they started, as China declared its objections. For its part, North Korea, being the target of the exercises, warned it was prepared to respond by launching a “retaliatory sacred war.” For the time being at least, tensions in Northeast Asia are running high.
The US and South Korea’s main purpose in holding the naval exercises is to put pressure on North Korea as a way of expressing their anger at the sinking of the South Korean corvette Cheonan, allegedly by a North Korean torpedo, and to deter the North from committing similar acts of aggression in future.
In addition, the US wants to use the maneuvers to express its determined support for the South Korean government, strengthen the US-South Korea military alliance, confirm the US’ leading position in the Asia-Pacific and put a check on China’s fast-growing influence in the region.
However, it is doubtful whether this action by the US and South Korea will really discourage provocative behavior by North Korea or help maintain peace on the Korean Peninsula. Following the sinking of the Cheonan, North Korea has expressed its wish to restart six-party talks with China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the US on its nuclear weapons program.
Even if the US and South Korea think North Korea made this offer just as a means of dodging the issue, they should still take the opportunity to get the six-party talks going again.
Renewed talks could be a forum for resolving controversy over who was responsible for the Cheonan’s sinking, as well as moving forward with discussion on stopping North Korea’s development of nuclear weapons.
Experience suggests that using joint military maneuvers to put pressure on Pyongyang will only provoke more headstrong responses by North Korea, rather than persuading it to give ground.
Just as expected, the North’s immediate reaction to the naval exercises was to warn that it would respond with “powerful nuclear deterrence.”
Although this is just bluster, and North Korea would not dare to attack the allied US and South Korean forces, it still means that relations between South and North Korea are going to get worse.
Besides, South Korean President Lee Myung-bak’s government has said again and again that South Korea has no intention of going to war with the North.
Indeed, no country in East Asia wants to see military conflict between the two Koreas.
What is the point, then, of provoking North Korea with large-scale military exercises? Given that neither the US nor South Korea wants a war, and that war games will not make Pyongyang yield, but will rather strengthen its resolve to resist, there is a clear contradiction between the two allies’ intentions and their actions.
Another notable development is China’s outspoken reaction. The US-South Korean exercises were originally supposed to put pressure on North Korea, so the two allies probably didn’t expect China to object so strongly.
One reason for China’s displeasure at the US-South Korean maneuvers was its worries that they would prompt countermeasures by Pyongyang, adding to tensions on the Korean Peninsula.
These worries are based on Beijing’s familiarity with the North Korean leadership’s mentality, and the North’s fiery response shows that China’s judgment was quite accurate.
Another reason for Beijing’s displeasure is that the maneuvers are being held too close to China’s territorial waters, plus the fact that these naval exercises are on a larger scale than ever before.
The US fleet includes the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George Washington, whose operational range reaches over China’s territory and poses a threat to its national security.
In the past, China has quietly put up with similar military exercises. Besides, China’s own submarines often approach Japanese and US territorial waters, so it is in a shaky position when it criticizes the US and South Korea for doing the same thing.
Beijing’s repeated public objections this time are a sign of China’s confidence in its own growing power. As China extends what it sees as a security zone around its territory, it can no longer tolerate the US or other countries holding threatening military exercises within what it considers its sphere of influence.
Reports say that the US has already decided not to send the USS George Washington to take part in any maneuvers in the Yellow Sea — a decision intended to allay China’s objections.
This subtle interaction between the two countries shows that while the US is anxious about the spread of China’s power in East Asia, it must also pay it its due respect. These unfolding developments are signs that power relations between the two countries in East Asia are being readjusted.
Wang Kao-cheng is a professor in the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS