Any other day, Senator John McCain might have answered a reporter's question about campaign strategy straight on.
On Tuesday, it was different.
"I've got to savor the moment," the indefatigable warrior said as he at last laid claim to the Republican presidential nomination that eluded him eight years ago.
It was a sweet victory for McCain, a prisoner of war in Vietnam whose life has had a rise-and-fall-and-rise-again rhythm to it.
His quest for the presidency has been no different.
Eight years ago this week, McCain folded his 2000 presidential campaign with a vow to "keep trying to force open doors where there are walls."
And one wall after another presented itself to McCain in his quest for the nomination this time, but he broke through them all.
The long-ago front-runner for this year's nomination, McCain found his campaign in serious trouble by the time he made his candidacy formal last April.
He had to slash a bloated campaign staff as fundraising lagged and polls showed him sliding.
But McCain, a former Navy pilot, knew a thing or two about pressing forward in the face of adversity.
As a prisoner for more than five years, he had been forced by his captors to sign a confession and later wrote that he doubted "I would ever stand up to any man again. Nothing could save me."
McCain, though, proved his resilience, and refused to accept release from Hanoi before prisoners who had been held longer.
McCain's latest comeback began in a war zone as well -- half a world away at a place called, fittingly enough, Camp Victory.
As his presidential campaign unraveled back home, McCain spent Independence Day last year at the sprawling US headquarters on the edge of Baghdad and watched in the heat as 588 US troops re-enlisted. Afterward, the soldiers swarmed McCain and Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, to thank them for their support.
Depressed, doubtful his campaign could prevail, McCain turned to Graham on the flight home and said: "We can't give up on those kids ... We have to keep this campaign up."
McCain remembers the moment as a turning point.
Before long, he was traveling Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina on his "No Surrender" bus tour, an exhortation not only for the US course in Iraq but also for himself.
"I was experienced enough to know that our campaign was in trouble," McCain later said. "But I was determined to struggle on."
McCain's new resolve after the Iraq trip last summer did not lessen the disarray he confronted upon his return home. He had just laid off more than 50 campaign workers and slashed the pay of others. He had US$2 million in the bank, a pittance for a presidential candidate. He was running in single digits in the polls in Iowa and South Carolina, two early voting states, trailing even Law & Order actor Fred Thompson, the former Tennessee senator, who had not entered the race.
The death watch on his candidacy had begun, forcing him to bat away speculation he would drop out.
"Ridiculous," he insisted.
Not much earlier, McCain had been the candidate to beat in a crowded field of potential Republican candidates.
The 2006 midterm elections had barely ended when he had taken his first formal steps toward a second presidential run, forming an exploratory committee and offering himself as a "common-sense conservative" in the tradition of former US president Ronald Reagan. He worked to build ties to conservatives who had been alienated from his first presidential run in 2000.
McCain, who lost the Republican nomination to US President George W. Bush in 2000, created a powerhouse national organization for his second run, a command hierarchy akin to Bush's, in fact.
It almost flattened him.
The imposing structure did not fit McCain, who is at his best as the scrappy insurgent, in close contact with voters, in easy give-and-take with reporters.
The play of world events worked against him, too.
The war in Iraq was going badly, hugely unpopular at home. Democrats in Congress were pushing for withdrawal. McCain, a four-term senator from Arizona, was the key backer of Bush's troop-increase strategy.
The emergence of immigration as a central political issue was a problem, too. McCain's support for an eventual path to citizenship for illegal immigrants angered conservative Republicans.
And there were questions about his age, especially in a campaign year when the buzz was all about change.
McCain would be 72 by Inauguration Day next January, the oldest first-term president.
Comics had a field day.
Jay Leno joked that No Country for Old Men was not just a movie title, it was McCain's campaign slogan.
Sometimes, the simplest explanations are the best.
John McCain came back by being John McCain. "Mac is Back," the signs proclaimed.
He rejected advice to shift his stance on Iraq. He picked himself up with a loyal coterie of aides and campaigned like he did in 2000, holding an unending string of town hall-style events where he laid himself bare for voters in the kind of intimate interaction that works best for him.
The staff departures resulted in a streamlined operation that suited McCain far better.
Events beyond McCain's control went his way, too.
The declining violence in Iraq vindicated his strong support of the military effort. Immigration became less of a campaign issue.
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee came out of nowhere to steal victory from ex-Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney in the leadoff Iowa caucuses, where McCain did not compete.
That gave McCain a bigger opening to grab momentum in New Hampshire, a state amenable to politics of redemption.
Former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani's failure to take off in Florida helped cement McCain's status as the Republican front-runner.
McCain's pared-down campaign was likened to a pirate ship, a rapscallion's domain with hangers-on giving advice and keeping the candidate company.
Gone were all the high-paid consultants.
In their place, a cadre of experienced hands who are volunteering their time -- because they believe in the man. On the trail, they huddle around McCain hashing out strategy and message.
McCain, who likes to say he's "older than dirt," with "more scars than Frankenstein," knows there is still a long way to go.
The campaign ahead, he said on Tuesday, "will have its ups and downs."
That was an understatement.
Questions about his age linger. His off-the-cuff wit and famous temper are sure to get him in trouble. His part in the Keating Five savings-and-loan scandal has also been mentioned.
More recently, he has had to answer questions about his relationship with a Washington lobbyist and her ties to business interests he dealt with on the Senate Commerce Committee.
Many Republican conservatives still do not trust him, citing his positions on issues such as immigration, campaign finance and global warming, as well as his ongoing feud with the religious right.
McCain, though, is steeled for whatever may come his way. His darkest moments likely are behind him.
During his imprisonment in Vietnam, he refused to accept release before other servicemen who had been held longer.
But his captors eventually broke his will and he signed a confession stating that he was "a black criminal and I have performed deeds of an air pirate."
"All my pride was lost, and I doubted I would ever stand up to any man again," he wrote later. "Nothing could save me."
Time has proved him wrong about that.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS