Although calls for relaxation of restrictions on two-way investment between Taiwan and China are becoming de rigueur, concerns remain about how far and how fast the ban should be lifted. Other concerns include the nature of the international capital, the structure of China's foreign investments and the cross-strait relationship.
Recently, sovereign wealth funds worth up to US$2.5 trillion have been set up by China, Russia, Persian Gulf countries and Singapore and have acquired financial assets in other countries -- particularly in developed countries -- and merged with well-known enterprises or invested in strategically important industries. Such investment behavior has raised economic and even national security concerns in free and open countries such as the US.
Former US Treasury secretary and noted economist Lawrence Summers has described this phenomenon as "cross-border nationalization." He has called on the IMF and other international organizations to work out a code of conduct. It is therefore clear that the problems are serious.
In recent years, China has become the largest recipient of foreign direct investment (FDI) among developing countries and the fourth largest in the world, after the US, the UK and France.
In 2006, China alone saw an FDI of US$78.1 billion, 6 percent of the global share. With accumulated foreign exchange reserves of approximately US$1.5 trillion -- mainly from the nation's trade surplus -- China has gradually been willing and able to invest abroad.
In 2006, China's foreign investment reached US$20 billion, ranking 13th in the world. Investments were mainly in Asia and Latin America, concentrated in the fields of energy and strategic materials.
Although investment performance has been pretty good for a beginner, we can say China's foreign investment is still relatively small. It is because many countries are still wary of the "China threat" and, most importantly, because China still maintains strict controls on capital transfers and capital accounts, especially for private capital.
For instance, China bans residents from directly investing abroad. In addition, private enterprises are still not active enough to support the relatively delicate overseas investments. In 2004, for example, non-government enterprises only accounted for one-fifth of the nation's listed companies. Despite their limited international experience, state-owned enterprises still play a primary role in China's foreign investment, while non-government enterprises only make up one percent of the nation's total investment.
China's blatant state control of the foreign investment structure has led several US lawmakers to urge the US Committee on Foreign Investment to be highly vigilant of Chinese investments as they could pose a threat to the nation's economic security.
In particular, China's political motivation is likely to be greater than its business concern, which usually serves as a good cover for officials initiating an investigation. The US government is concerned about not only Chinese investment, but also China's industrial espionage, which could result in US state-of-the-art military technology being leaked to a third country if a company were later bought out.
However, this has led China to change its investment strategy when acquiring US enterprises. For example, Chinese companies intentionally grab less than 10 percent of market share to avoid holding management rights. They may have a third partner involved in the investment to diminish US concerns.
As far as Chinese capital investment in Taiwan is concerned, the real estate, securities and equities and real business sectors have received a great deal of attention in recent years. Since August 2002, Taiwan has officially opened up to China capital investment in real estate. Yet tedious application procedures for Chinese investment and strict restrictions on outgoing capital from China have hampered the process. As a result of these barriers, fewer than 10 transactions have been successfully completed over the years.
Until now, Taiwan has not deregulated short term Chinese investment in stocks and bonds and long term investment in the manufacturing industries. Since two-way communication plays an important role in economic activities, it is expected that Taiwan will move toward further liberaliza-tion. Ideally, Chinese investment in Taiwan may cause personnel movement, services and trade opportunities, profit repatriation or taxation, and thus perhaps balance the situation.
However, looking at global trends and past experience in cross-strait relations and the nature of China's economy, we should impose strict regulations on Chinese investments through state-run enterprises and sovereign wealth funds. It is even more essential that we learn from how the US has handled foreign and Chinese investments through legislation and policies.
Honigmann Tsai-lung Hong is an associate research fellow at the international affairs division of the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Translated by Ted Yang
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS