It is high time someone spoke up and advised the Taiwan Government that when they use the terms "mainland" to refer to China and "province" to refer to Taiwan, they are shooting themselves in the foot politically. The improper use of these words makes native speakers wonder if the government has erred in English, or if they actually do know what they are doing, linguistically speaking.
Those in the West who are politically conscious know that China arrogantly believes Taiwan belongs to them and Taiwan denies this vehemently. Yet every time the Taiwan Government or press refers to China as the "mainland," they acknowledge China's claim.
In popular English use, mainland is "the continent or the main part of a continent distinguished from an offshore island, cape or peninsula" and connotes ownership and/or possession.
The word "province" is just as straightforward. The second most common definition of the word includes: "an administrative district or division of a country." This second definition is the one most often attributed to the word.
If Taiwan is not, as the West is being led to believe, a province of China, why then, do we find the Taiwan tax office labeled "National Tax Administration of Northern Taiwan Province?" We find listings for Taiwan Provincial Government. Are we to believe Taiwan is a province of itself? Clearly, if the the Taiwan Government and people believe they are a province of China, why should the West dispute them?
The third word that makes Westerners wonder what is really going on in the minds of the Taiwan government is "memorial."
The name Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall is correct and befitting this shrine to a dead person. A proposed name change to "Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall" says that democracy in Taiwan is dead and this is the memorial to it. A memorial can only be constructed to someone or something that is deceased or otherwise no longer a viable entity.
There are numerous free online dictionaries; why does no one in the government (ruling or opposition parties) choose to use them?
Until the government decides to put its own English-language house in order, I suggest it stop berating students for their English. Taiwan has a wealth of qualified English professionals living here. I urge you to make suitable use of your resources.
Taiwan Government English proficiency grade: Fail.
Stephen Riter
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath