Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
Buoyed by President Chen Shui-bian's (
Hsieh has met figures from across the political spectrum, including those with whom he has seemingly little in common, such as New Party Chairman Yok Mu-ming (
Hsieh has also been shooting off policy ideas with gay abandon, and while his new found freedom must be refreshing to DPP supporters worried by his hermit-like pre-Jan. 12 behavior, he will need to watch his back, as some of his ideas are likely to raise the hackles of hardcore DPP members.
Talking to Chen about shelving the referendum on entering the UN under the name Taiwan, suggesting Ma could be his premier and a softer line on cross-strait economic exchanges may all sound like reasonable propositions to many taking into account the political landscape, but they are anathema to many in the DPP.
The "independence or nothing" crowd will find it extremely hard to keep quiet if Hsieh carries on in this vein, but if they use their heads and consider the bigger picture, they will realize staying silent is the best course of action.
The DPP is still recovering from the disaster that was former chairman Yu Shyi-kun's two years in charge, when deep green elements ruled the roost and hounded dissenting voices or those who dared to criticize leaders or policy out of the party set-up. This did untold damage to the party, most notably during last year's legislative primaries, when several very capable -- but moderate -- lawmakers were labeled "bandits" and replaced with far less impressive figures, producing disastrous results.
The party needs to relearn the value of tolerating different opinions if it is to survive, as there is no political party in the world where every member has the same view on every subject. For evidence of this it need look no further than the KMT, which over the years has seen numerous splits and spin-off parties formed as a result of factional fighting. Nevertheless, the deserters eventually came back into the fold and the KMT's success in keeping potential rebels and dissenters silent ahead of the recent legislative polls arguably contributed to its performance.
Hsieh has done well since he took the helm, but he has just 58 days to achieve his goal. To do that he will need the full support of the whole pan-green camp in his battle against a revitalized KMT.
Hsieh knows the DPP cannot and will not win the presidential election by continuing to appeal only to its core supporters -- the 40 percent who will back the party come rain or shine. It needs to win back voters put off by the party's recent excesses if it is to stand any chance of victory in March.
Maximizing the party's appeal in such a short time while keeping dissenting voices in check will be a tough task, but Hsieh has got to perform if he wants to extend his political career into April.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations