Can Europe's economy stay on track even if the US goes off the rails?
This old question is being asked with new urgency across the continent, after a startling divergence this week in how the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Federal Reserve are reading economic tea leaves.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke signaled on Thursday that the Fed would cut rates to try to ward off a recession. Earlier that day, European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet told a news conference in Frankfurt, Germany, that the signals on European growth were mixed.
A growing number of economists, convinced that Europe is not as insulated from the US' woes as many Europeans would like to believe, are questioning why, at such a sensitive moment, the ECB is warning it might raise interest rates.
"The ECB sees the glass as half full; the Fed sees it as half empty," said Thomas Mayer, the chief European economist at Deutsche Bank. "It's not a difference in the data; it's a difference in the analysis."
The simplest explanation for the ECB's hawkish demeanor is its inflation-fighting mandate.
Trichet, for example, has warned labor unions not to use Europe's inflation rate of 3.1 percent as a pretext for demanding steep wage increases.
But while Trichet has thrust himself into German labor negotiations, several economists argue that the bank is underestimating the impact in Europe of a recession in the US.
The bank, Mayer said, still does not believe that the credit crisis originating in the US mortgage market poses a grave risk to Europe's economic prospects. That, he said, is why the bank is threatening a rate increase when it should be preparing for a rate cut.
Disputing another train of thought popular in Europe, Jacques Cailloux, head of euro area economic research for the Royal Bank of Scotland, said: "The ECB is wrong in its assessment that the emerging markets can offset the US downturn."
He added: "The whole idea of globalization is at odds with the thesis of decoupling."
Decoupling refers to the argument that Europe is not as dependent on the US as it once was because Europe's exports to China and other emerging economies have grown so much faster than its exports to the US.
The thesis became fashionable in the last year as an explanation for the growth rate in the US slowing as big European economies accelerated.
In its World Economic Outlook last spring, the IMF suggested that the faltering US economy had limited impact on world growth because economic fragility in the US was rooted in a troubled housing market -- a national phenomenon that was less subject to global contagion.
The chapter was titled "Decoupling the Train," but the authors put a question mark after the title, cautioning that housing woes could spill into other areas of the US economy, in which case they could become the world's troubles.
This is so because the mortgage problems have mutated into a credit crisis that crossed the Atlantic. European banks, like their US counterparts, have been forced to write down billions of dollars in the value of complex securities backed by subprime mortgages.
The ECB responded as forcefully as any central bank to the turmoil caused by the credit crunch. This week, it said it would inject another US$20 billion into the financial system, the latest in a stream of liquidity injections since August.
But Trichet has stopped short of saying that the financial crisis could halt European growth. At his news conference on Thursday, after the bank left its benchmark rate unchanged at 4 percent, he said the signals on Europe were mixed.
"Our baseline scenario remains one of ongoing growth, but risks are clearly on the downside," he said.
For Mayer and other economists, the question is not whether the credit crisis will dent Europe's economy, but when. Housing sales in Spain and Ireland -- two of Europe's hottest property markets -- have already dried up, he said, and France will not be far behind.
"Europe suffers from the same problems as the US does," Mayer said. "The trade linkages between Europe and the US may have come down in recent years, but that is beside the point."
Cailloux of Royal Bank of Scotland said there was even a correlation between Germany's exports to China and its exports to the US.
As China exports less to the US, Cailloux said, it has less demand for German exports, like machine tools.
"Europe's exports to Asia are indirectly related to final demand in the US," he said.
This coupling will soon become apparent to the ECB, Cailloux predicted. The bank's next shift in monetary policy, he said, would be a rate cut, not a rate increase.
The FBI on Sunday arrested Wanying “Heather” Chang (張婉瑩) on suspicion of surveiling the family of the son of President William Lai (賴清德) on behalf of China, an example of “transnational repression” to suppress dissent in Taiwan and abroad. Zhang, a 34-year old realtor in California, was arrested on charges of working as an unregistered agent for China. She and an accomplice were accused of taking photos and videos of Lai’s son and his family, and sending information about their whereabouts and license plates to Chinese officials. “The information could be used by China to gain leverage over the Taiwanese president
On Oct. 10, 1911, gunfire in Wuchang (武昌) shattered the stillness of late-Qing China. What began as a regional uprising quickly ignited a chain reaction across the empire, toppling a dynastic order that had endured for more than two millennia and ushering in one of Asia’s first republics — the Republic of China (ROC). From that moment, the 10th day of the 10th month became a date of epochal significance, not merely in Chinese history, but in the broader arc of Asia’s encounter with modernity. Yet today, as Taiwan marks Double Ten National Day, the holiday’s meaning has undergone a transformation
A few days ago, we left our breakfast midway to catch a glimpse of the fighter jets in formation. It was a spectacular sight. We knew it was part of practice drills for Double Ten National Day celebrations and reminded us of the Annual Republic day celebration in India. While channel surfing, I came across a news debate about immigration laws, where an academic asked a fellow panelist: “Why should we be interested in your point of view when you don’t even belong here?” That got me thinking. Was our enthusiasm about the upcoming Double Ten celebrations unwarranted? Was this
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal