Liaquat Garden has long been a popular spot for young Pakistani couples to meet. Today, however, it has morphed into a shrine after the assassination of opposition leader Benazir Bhutto.
Each day since her slaying in a gun-suicide bomb attack on Dec. 27 at this park in Rawalpindi, a garrison city near Islamabad, dozens of people have come to lay flowers and light candles near the main entrance under a large portrait of Bhutto.
Her death is the latest chapter in a long history of political assassinations, sectarian clashes, ethnic violence, terrorism and Islamic militancy in this country of 160 million people.
And Bhutto, 54, was not the first political leader to be cut down at Liaquat Garden.
"This used to be a small park named Company Garden, and then the country's first prime minister, Liaquat Ali Khan, was shot twice in the chest during a public meeting here in October 1951, and he succumbed to his injuries at the hospital," recalled Saud Saher, 71, a prominent Pakistani journalist. "The place was named after him."
Amid public anger over the death of Khan, who played a vital role in Pakistan's independence movement in the 1940s, the government called in British investigators from Scotland Yard to assist the investigations.
But they had little to work on, because the only evidence was the shooter, who was killed by a policeman, Saher said. Scotland Yard left Pakistan before the investigation was completed. Their report was never made public.
History has repeated itself at Liaquat Garden. Bhutto, a former prime minister, was likely shot by her attacker before he detonated a bomb, killing himself and 22 people. The government has accused a Taliban commander linked to al-Qaeda of ordering the hit on Bhutto, while authorities in 1951 accused the Khaksar Movement, an anti-colonial Muslim organization, of assassinating Khan.
And as they did five decades ago, the Pakistani government of today, in this case President Pervez Musharraf, has again invited Scotland Yard to assist in the investigation into Bhutto's murder.
Once again, it will not be easy. The assassin died in the attack -- there is speculation there was an accomplice who detonated the bomb -- and local street workers hosed down and swept up the crime scene within a few hours, potentially destroying valuable forensic evidence.
The investigation into Bhutto's assassination has yet to have a breakthrough. The evidence that Taliban commander Baitullah Mehsud is behind the hit is circumstantial at best.
The government has not helped its own case by making contradictory statements about how Bhutto died, including initially claiming that there was no gunman and then saying she was not shot but cracked her head on the sunroof of her security vehicle in the explosion.
Ironically, the doctor who attempted to resuscitate Bhutto when she was rushed to Rawalpindi General Hospital with bullet wounds is the son of the doctor who attempted to save Khan when he was shot.
A spokesman for Mehsud quickly denied responsibility, saying the attack may have been masterminded by rogue elements within the country's military, which also hanged Bhutto's father and former prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in 1979 following an army coup. His execution also took place in Rawalpindi, the headquarters of the army.
Prior to her death at Liaquat Garden, Bhutto said she had sent a letter to Musharraf in which she reportedly wrote that his close allies, including two former provincial ministers and the head of Pakistan's intelligence agency, should be held responsible if she were killed.
Bhutto's family has made similar accusations, pointing a finger at elements within Pakistan's so-called "establishment" -- a powerful but informal lobby of military officers, bureaucrats and hand-picked civilian politicians who run the country behind a facade of democracy.
The public and some historians have suggested over the years that this "establishment" also had Khan killed because he was a popular civilian leader.
The "establishment" has never accepted the existence of civilian government and a genuine democratic process because they both undermine their absolute authority to run the country, said Saher, who has covered Pakistani politics for five decades.
Crucial parliamentary elections, which were postponed until Feb. 18 following Bhutto's assassination, are supposed to usher in the return of civilian government following eight years of military rule by Musharraf, a recently retired army general.
But the polls will be bittersweet after the death of Bhutto, whose Pakistan People's Party was tipped to win and select her as prime minister for an unprecedented third term.
"The things that have happened at Liaquat Garden have destroyed the nation," Ihsanul Haq, a rickshaw driver, said after offering a prayer for Bhutto at her makeshift shrine.
"We should turn this place into something else, like a shrine for Bhutto or a business center," he added.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS