THERE WAS CONCERN last year that the annual Taipei 101 New Year's Eve fireworks display would not push through because of opposition from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-controlled city government, which was worried that the central government would use the occasion to promote its "UN for Taiwan" bid. After the conflict was resolved, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
The show went on as scheduled. After the show, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) criticized the city government for the air pollution caused by the number of barbecues hold that night. The EPA would have done better to take a look at the pollution caused by the massive fireworks.
Prior to the festivities, the media was full of guidelines on the best locations to view the fireworks display, telling the public to avoid down-wind locations as they would be enveloped by smoke. Unfortunately, the densely packed residential areas to the south-west of Taipei 101 are vulnerable to northeasterly winds. While tourists praised the show, local residents had to put up with the smell of smoke and gunpowder seeping inside their homes. While the air pollution caused by the fireworks will eventually dissipate, the cost of putting up such a lavish display is a burden that future generations must bear.
Shallow politicians construct false images of prosperity with resplendent shows to cover up their inadequacies. In an M-shaped society like Taiwan's, those who struggle on the margins hope that the ephemeral joys of the fireworks display can dull 365 days of hardship.
Finding joy at the expense of others seems to be a common thread in this society. In the last two years, Xinyi District has had to cope with the crush of hundreds of thousands of people during the New Year's Eve celebrations despite advanced preparations to divert traffic flow. By 7pm or 8pm, the surrounding areas were completely congested: Motorbikes not only blocked the entrance of apartment buildings, but were also parked in the middle of roads.
While the celebrations ended just after midnight, many were unable to get home until sunrise. Public complaints about the congestion describe the New Year's fireworks an annual nightmare. While Xinyi District has skywalks that serve as emergency service routes, local residents have nothing to fall back on: Were an emergency to occur, are helicopters supposed to land on residential rooftops to provide assistance?
Similar situations are played out across the city because of improper urban planning. The Taipei City Government boasts of the Maokong Gondola attracting millions of tourists. However, the pride of former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Hau was built at the expense of residents of Qixia Community (棲霞山莊), who must suffer the noise pollution and loss of privacy. Meanwhile, tourists have to pray for luck and hope they don't get stuck halfway through the ride. And, the much-vaunted tourism boost for the area's tea plantations has yet to come true.
Despite this failed experience, there are now proposals to build a similar cable car system in Beitou -- ignoring the threat it poses to the area's ecology and traditional hot-spring culture.
Building a new sports arena next to the old cigarette factory in Songshan District is an even more ridiculous project. Once finished, there will be two sports arenas within 2km of each other -- the only difference being the new one would be able to host baseball games.
Very few city councilors are brave enough to oppose the project because of concerns over votes from baseball fans. Baseball games that can draw a crowd of more than 5,000 occur only about 10 times a year, so constructing a 40,000-seat arena is not really necessary.
In the end, the sports arena will be used for concerts held by foreign pop stars and for business events of large corporations. In fact, two-thirds of the floor space and investment capital will be taken over by the already ubiquitous shopping mall or other business facilities.
It would be far better to preserve this rare green space and turn it into a second forest park with a community baseball field. Such a plan would be more effective in raising the quality of life in the city and encourage the public to participate in sports activities.
Capitalism creates enormous business opportunities. However, a government that is lacking in creativity and power of execution becomes lost in the marketing of popular trends. The public needs a smart political party that can see through the trap of buying votes through ill-conceived policies -- a party that knows how to spend money where it matters so that society can enjoy the benefits.
Pan Han-shen is the secretary-general of the Taiwan Green Party and a part-time lecturer at Aletheia University.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with