On Dec. 26, the Cabinet decided that beginning with this year's first crop, the government's purchase price for paddy rice would be raised by NT$2 per kg, as the price had not been adjusted since 1993 and production costs have risen by an estimated 11 percent since then. While appearing to benefit rice farmers by raising their revenue, in reality, the measure is disadvantageous to the development of the rice industry as a whole.
The overall effects of a policy should be observed, as short-term benefits may have undesirable consequences in the long run. Raising the price will stimulate production but hurt the long-term revenue of paddy farmers.
In order to join the WTO, Taiwan reduced the area of rice cultivation by 110,000 hectares over 10 years -- from 364,000 hectares in 1997 to 263,000 hectares in 2006. With the higher purchase price, originally fallow fields will be re-cultivated. This will boost the economy of farming villages, but it will also raise farm labor costs, ultimately causing revenues to decline.
The rise will also cause trade on the paddy market to slow. If the purchase price of public grain is raised at a time when the recent price of paddy has not exceeded NT$20 per kilogram, farmers will sell their entire stock to the government and grain traders will not be able to function.
In 2006, the total paddy output was 1.558 million tonnes, of which 244,000 tonnes were purchased as public grain and 1.314 million tonnes went into the public market. If the purchase price were raised by NT$2, the amount of rice on the public market would fall to 832,000 tonnes, removing 482,000 tonnes of trade volume. The originally torpid paddy market would become even more so. From a free market perspective, this is extremely harmful to the industry.
Raising government subsidies also does not accord with national policy. Taiwan promised the WTO that the total domestic paddy subsidy would not exceed NT$5.06 billion (US$156 million). Based on figures from 2006, the cultivated area for this year's first crop would be an estimated 155,248 hectares, with about 484,000 tonnes in purchases. The second crop area will be 107,940 hectares, with 242,000 tonnes in purchases. Assuming the international price is NT$9 per kg, the total domestic paddy subsidy would be NT$10.169 billion -- twice the amount which Taiwan promised. If the nation is shown to have increased rather than decreased its subsidies, it will have a negative effect on the next round of international negotiations. This policy should be reconsidered.
Lee Yuan-ho is professor and department head at Fo Guang University's Department of Economics.
Translated by Angela Hong
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US