CHINESE NATIONALIST Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
While US$30,000 has become the consensus target for mid-term growth, whether it can be attained remains to be seen.
In the 21st century, the control and use of information has become the central means of generating wealth. Those who are not able to use information technology will lose their competitive edge. Hence all countries are doing their utmost to give rise to an information-driven society by providing basic infrastructure.
In 2005, global Internet use was estimated at an average of 137 users out of every 1,000 people. The number was 527 per 1,000 people in high-income countries, 115 in middle-income countries and only 44 in low-income countries. On average, only 42 out of every 1,000 individuals globally had access to broadband: 163 per 1,000 people in high-income countries, 23 in middle-income countries and just one in low-income countries.
Can the pervasiveness of information technology be linked to high economic productivity? Data released by the World Bank show that 19 countries had a GDP per capita above US$30,000 in 2006, including Norway, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Iceland. Figures compiled by the International Telecommunication Union show that the average number of Internet users in those 19 countries was 297 per 1,000 people.
In the same year, Taiwan had 308 Internet users per 1,000 people. However, the number of broadband users was comparatively low, at 198 people per 1,000. From the figures alone it appears that the penetration of information technology in Taiwan is not lower than in high-income countries.
In Asia, Singapore has the highest ratio of Internet users at 528 for every 1,000 people, while Hong Kong has 385 and South Korea has 293. Taiwan, with 308, ranks higher than South Korea. Yet South Korea ranked first in terms of the proportion of broadband users, at 293 per 1,000 people, followed by Hong Kong with 252. Singapore had 182.
If the penetration of the Internet reflects the economic abilities of a country, then how can we explain Taiwan's situation, where pervasiveness is high yet per capita GDP is only half that of comparable countries?
This may stem from the fact that information on the Internet is predominantly in English -- and the ability of Taiwanese Web users to understand English is limited. This would also explain why Hong Kong and Singapore's GDP per capita, at US$28,000, far outstrips that of Taiwan and South Korea.
Be it the "Big Investment, Big Warmth" policy or the 12 "Love Taiwan" measures, proposals for building infrastructure for broadband access are very much correct.
Yet building infrastructure is easy compared with educating the people on how to use computers. I have colleagues at National Taiwan University who are unable to use computers. In Taiwan, several million individuals between the ages of 50 and 60 still need to learn how to use computers and the Internet. Until this has been achieved, the US$30,000 goal will be impossible to achieve.
Neither the Cabinet's nor the opposition's proposals provide a solution to this problem. Strategists and policymakers have much to do.
Tu Jenn-hwa is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of National Development at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Angela Hong
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Last year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) turned the Double Ten National Day ceremony into a platform for grievances against the government. Yesterday, standing before the president and foreign dignitaries, he warned against Taiwan becoming a “false democracy, in reality a dictatorship.” Then he called for unity. Democratic leaders must tolerate criticism, even on ceremonial occasions, but Han misused his position and a national celebration to insinuate that Taiwan’s elected president was steering the country toward dictatorship and cast himself as a statesman offering reconciliation. Han asked how Taiwan’s security should be examined, using a medical analogy. If he insists on playing
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
RSS