On Oct. 12, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that it was awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to former US vice president Al Gore and the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
They were given the award for their "efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change."
The IPCC is a scientific intergovernmental body set up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the UN Environment Program (UNEP). It is responsible for assessing "the latest scientific, technical and socio-economic literature produced worldwide" with relevance to the problem of climate change.
Thanks to the efforts of the IPCC, the UN has been able to pay greater attention to the risks of global warming. In 1992, it passed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), building a fundamental framework through which the international community can address global warming.
To further reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the UNFCCC member states passed the legally binding Kyoto Protocol on Dec. 11, 1997.
The Kyoto Protocol is a control agreement restricting greenhouse gas emissions and reducing the impact of climate change on the environmental ecology.
Article 3 of the protocol states that the signatory 38 industrialized countries and the EU have to reduce their overall greenhouse gas emissions to at least 5 percent below 1990 levels during the five-year commitment period between next year and 2012.
According to Department of Health statistics, Taiwan in ranked 22nd in the world in terms of total carbon dioxide emissions in 2005. From the perspective of sustainable global development, Taiwan is also a member of the global village, and thus has the responsibility and obligation to participate in the global reduction of carbon dioxide emissions.
From the perspective of the relationship between rights and obligations, it is true that Taiwan is not a UN member state, nor is it a member state of the UNFCCC.
UN environmental protection agreements are thus not binding for Taiwan. But given Taiwan's economic strength, the UNFCCC member states will likely expect Taiwan to fulfill the relevant obligations.
As only a UNFCCC signatory, Taiwan is unable to participate in diplomatic negotiations and discussions about the flexibility mechanisms for the reduction of greenhouse gases and cannot make its voice heard on the international stage. However, after agreements are made, Taiwan is forced to accept the decisions.
This state of affairs makes it clear that it is necessary for Taiwan to gain UN membership. This is the only way that the international community will pay attention to the opinions and rights of Taiwanese.
Chen Lung-chu is the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS