Rarely in Africa has the human cost of war and greed been clearer than in this dingy, broken, sweltering corner of hell. Yet nowhere has the expectation of change created so much hope.
After 14 years of darkness, street lights shine amid the shattered buildings. And the new president -- the first woman elected to head an African country -- stands under an umbrella in the driving rain to launch repairs to a road with almost as many holes as pavement.
Liberia last year began a grand experiment to overcome its past through a sea change in how it is run. The new leaders are elected. Parliament is controlled by the opposition for the first time in its history. And President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf promises a new deal funded by donors and investors lured by peace and good governance.
"This country will never be what it was before," said Augustine Toe, a lawyer who directs the Roman Catholic Peace and Justice Commission. "People are starting to hold the government accountable more than ever before in our history. For the first time we are beginning to have a semblance of checks and balances."
Two-thirds of African countries now hold elections that are considered democratic, but democracy is a loaded word in Africa. In Zimbabwe, for example, President Robert Mugabe claims he is democratic despite elections widely viewed as fraudulent, and last year's election in Sudan did nothing to curb conflict there.
Polling by the Pew Global Attitudes Project and the Afrobarometer research group find enthusiasm for democracy in Africa is still high but fading, as Africans discover it is messier in practice than on paper.
Liberia is trying to do something of which Africa has little experience: forge a system that can survive one leader and contain the excesses of the ruling class. The attempt goes against a history of leaders in Africa who cling to power long after their expiry date.
Liberia -- its name comes from liberty -- was founded by slaves freed by the US more than 150 years ago. But despite the mantle of freedom, the leaders of this West African country of 3.2 million people often came to power by force rather than a ballot box. The loser was sometimes tortured and killed under the dispassionate gaze of the winner.
CIVIL WAR
Even on a continent long plagued with violence, the civil war in Liberia stood out for its luridness and for the naked greed that drove it without any cloak of tribal or ideological concerns.
Soldiers for toppled President Charles Taylor, now facing trial for war crimes in The Hague, ate the hearts of slain enemies and decorated checkpoints with human entrails. His forces sliced open pregnant women and bet on the sex of the unborn child.
Johnson-Sirleaf, 69, was jailed twice under previous leaders and fled into exile. The Harvard-trained economist, who has worked for Citibank and the World Bank, won election in 2005. No public building was in good enough shape to host the inauguration ceremony, so guests sat on white plastic chairs on the grounds of the Capital Building and cheered, "Queen of Africa!"
"We know that your vote was a vote for change, a vote for peace, security," said Johnson-Sirleaf, a mother of four who is known as both Ma Ellen and the Iron Lady. "We have heard you loudly."
Early results are promising. Liberia's economy grew about 8 percent last year, after a freefall of more than 90 percent the preceding two decades. Inflation is in single digits, and growth this year could reach 11 percent.
But one look at Monrovia shows how far there is to go. Dozens of buildings are no longer habitable, and many others are covered in grime and a dull black mold. Electrical power goes up and down like a bucket from a well. Tropical downpours create pools of mud and stagnant water that stink in the heat.
Almost 90 percent of Liberians are unemployed. From early morning until late at night, the streets are clogged with legions of ragged people who seem to drift aimlessly in search of a way to make enough money to buy food.
The government and the UN have created 21,000 jobs through projects to repair roads, remove garbage, clean drains and carry out other basic tasks. Foreign investment promises to create thousands more. A billion-dollar payment by steel giant Arcelor-Mittal for an iron ore concession could create 3,500 jobs by itself.
Momolu Norman, a former child soldier, enrolled in a computer school under a UN program to retrain combatants. He now teaches at the school in the mornings and studies criminal justice and administration at university in the afternoons.
Instead of a Kalashnikov, he carries a computer memory stick tied to a lanyard looped around the button-down collar of his pink and white checked shirt.
Seven years ago, when Norman was 15, he was selling used clothes on the street when a truck came to round up boys for the army.
"I gave my clothes to someone I knew and tried to run," says Norman, now 22. "But they caught me and put me on the truck. My family didn't even know then what had happened to me."
Five years of terror followed, during which Norman saw friends lose their arms, legs and lives.
"I had to kill people -- I had no choice," he says. "I never wanted to be a soldier. When the UN intervened to end the war, I could finally do something for myself."
More than half a million Liberians have returned to their homes, according to the UN. And last month Johnson-Sirleaf persuaded the IMF to begin relief on Liberia's debt of US$3.5 billion.
The new openness at the top is obvious just from switching on the radio. Government officials are guests on talk shows almost daily, explaining policies, taking suggestions and fielding angry complaints. The justice minister tells a caller frankly that some police are corrupt. Every new initiative is presented for public comment.
At the Information Ministry, deputy Gabriel Williams is constantly interrupted by telephone calls and passers-by who open his office door to ask directions. He apologizes as he answers the phone for the fourth or fifth time in a few minutes, explaining that government must be accessible.
As he speaks, the lights flicker and die. The generator is turned off for the night.
"We only budget for so much fuel a day," Williams says.
He pauses briefly, then picks up his train of thought: "We inherited a system where there was no public trust in government. ... We are trying to change that."
One barrier to that trust is corruption, which costs Africa about US$148 billion a year, according to African Union estimates. Four years of corruption is enough to eat up all the foreign aid sent to Africa in the last 60 years.
Liberia used to be among the worst offenders. Money for government workers went to buy sport utility vehicles for politicians. There were secret no-bid contracts for mining rights. The families of many schoolchildren paid tuition at the central bank because successive school administrators fled the country with hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Liberia has now canceled concession contracts for rubber and timber that were awarded with dubious transparency. And it insists new contracts follow international business practices and give the country a cut for its exports.
"Firestone has been here for 97 years but we don't produce enough rubber locally to make a condom," says Sandra Howard-Kendor, deputy chairwoman of the Governance Commission established to direct reform.
OLD SYSTEM
The government is also decentralizing power to get rid of the old system of patronage. Every major government transaction is examined by both a Liberian manager and an international expert. Experts from Europe, the US and elsewhere in Africa help with financial management and train Liberian staff.
The business community in general is responding. Tony Hage, leader of the economically powerful Lebanese community, for example, says governance is improving. But the Liberian Business Association complains that foreign businesses are gaining more than locals, and it wants more and faster change.
Perhaps the clearest sign of change is the role of the opposition. Former soccer star George Weah, Johnson-Sirleaf's opponent in the runoff election, sat in the front row at her inauguration.
Even opposition politicians concede the government is bent on reform, and grumble mostly about the pace or the manner of change. One former presidential candidate complains that Johnson-Sirleaf is too tied to foreign investors. Another, lawyer Winston Tubman, says he would pursue the same good governance goals but reunite the country first.
"They are serious about what they are doing, but they are on the wrong track," says Tubman, the nephew of one-time president William Tubman and a lawyer who quit as the UN special envoy for Somalia to run for the presidency.
Overseas, Johnson-Sirleaf wins high praise and awards from the UN, the US and the EU.
At home, she draws guarded hope. Many Liberians are somewhat wary of her close ties with the World Bank and her early support for warlord Taylor, whom she later rejected, but still believe she is their best chance for a better life.
Norman, the reluctant one-time boy soldier, pushes his sunglasses up on top of his head and briefly surveys the chaos on the broken streets of Monrovia. Now that the country is at peace, people can work, go to school and dream again about a future, he says.
"The changes in Liberia are taking place a little slow," he adds. "But we expect this government to do something. We have faith it is doing its best to improve our lives."
"The difference," he says, leaning forward and speaking softly to emphasize his point, "is that we put this government into power."
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry