THE THIRD East Asia Summit (EAS) was held in Singapore last month. Following the example set in the previous two summits, Taiwan was again not invited.
The EAS included ASEAN, joined by China, Japan, South Korea and other countries. Issues discussed in this EAS covered conflict on the Korea Peninsula, climate change, the ongoing political crisis in Myanmar, regional economic integration and community awareness.
This annual gathering has touched upon issues with both political and economic dimensions that are of great concern to our country. Taiwan's absence indicates that the fear of being purposely excluded from the East Asian integration process is warranted.
The idea of East Asian integration was launched by Japan around 40 years ago. At that time, Japan tried to give East Asian self-awareness a wake-up call by adopting certain economic approaches.
Afraid of being sidelined due to its World War II aggression, Japan began to focus on strengthening its economic relations with developing countries in the region.
The concept of Asia-Pacific integration was also initiated by Japan, and the thought eventually gave birth to the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) and later APEC. Japan used practical economic means to activate East Asian awareness. However, the beginning of Asia-Pacific integration was a political move disguised as a call for economic cooperation.
Efforts by the PECC and APEC have helped construct an Asia-Pacific cooperation model that, while not as mature as the EU, is slowly but surely moving toward its goal.
Meanwhile, the EAS has given power to an emerging East Asian integration arrangement that could and might challenge the Asia-Pacific model.
According to a report from the World Bank, "ASEAN plus three [China, Japan and South Korea]" will be able to give a boost to the real GDP growth of all contracting parties.
With such an economic incentive, East Asian awareness has been encouraged further. Given the fact that strong economic ties exist between Taiwan and other East Asian countries, the potential benefits could be further maximized if Taiwan was included in the process.
Unfortunately, Taiwan does not have a seat at the EAS table. Nevertheless, it has long been a dedicated member of both the PECC and APEC.
That means Taiwan is officially part of the Asia-Pacific cooperation model, regardless of whether it is able to take part in East Asian integration.
Through the simple rule of supply and demand, the current East Asian or Asia-Pacific frameworks have been serving as a foundation to support the global value chain.
When it comes to the global economic system, regional phenomena can easily start a chain reaction. To prevent disasters like the East Asian financial crisis from happening again, countries in this region should realize the significance of economic and financial cooperation.
However, Taiwan does not have many options to choose from. It also has to deal with more constraints than other neighboring countries when trying to optimize its position. Although Japan started the East Asian integration process, the process is now dominated by China.
What should Taiwan's strategy be in response to numerous external constraints like not being invited to the EAS and the risk of being marginalized from the East Asian integration process?
The situation for Taiwan is complicated, but the solution can be simple.
Taiwan should never mistake the existing constraints as all the variables in the equation. It needs to place greater emphasis on decisions that can be made by Taiwan.
Decisions over which Taiwan has no influence are external constraints. To further simplify my argument, Taiwan can stop paying so much attention to the East Asian integration process and EAS and instead focus more on relevant Asia-Pacific developments including the PECC, APEC and the potential Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) region.
Lacking common roots, the idea of East Asian integration can only emerge if East Asians come to share a common vision of the future and are happy with their roles in such a vision.
But the current reality is that East Asia is still far from fulfilling that vision. On the other hand, the Asia-Pacific cooperation model is gradually becoming a reality. If opportunities for participation don't exist in one arena, Taiwan should allocate its valuable resources on feasible mechanisms.
Darson Chiu is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS