THE THIRD East Asia Summit (EAS) was held in Singapore last month. Following the example set in the previous two summits, Taiwan was again not invited.
The EAS included ASEAN, joined by China, Japan, South Korea and other countries. Issues discussed in this EAS covered conflict on the Korea Peninsula, climate change, the ongoing political crisis in Myanmar, regional economic integration and community awareness.
This annual gathering has touched upon issues with both political and economic dimensions that are of great concern to our country. Taiwan's absence indicates that the fear of being purposely excluded from the East Asian integration process is warranted.
The idea of East Asian integration was launched by Japan around 40 years ago. At that time, Japan tried to give East Asian self-awareness a wake-up call by adopting certain economic approaches.
Afraid of being sidelined due to its World War II aggression, Japan began to focus on strengthening its economic relations with developing countries in the region.
The concept of Asia-Pacific integration was also initiated by Japan, and the thought eventually gave birth to the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) and later APEC. Japan used practical economic means to activate East Asian awareness. However, the beginning of Asia-Pacific integration was a political move disguised as a call for economic cooperation.
Efforts by the PECC and APEC have helped construct an Asia-Pacific cooperation model that, while not as mature as the EU, is slowly but surely moving toward its goal.
Meanwhile, the EAS has given power to an emerging East Asian integration arrangement that could and might challenge the Asia-Pacific model.
According to a report from the World Bank, "ASEAN plus three [China, Japan and South Korea]" will be able to give a boost to the real GDP growth of all contracting parties.
With such an economic incentive, East Asian awareness has been encouraged further. Given the fact that strong economic ties exist between Taiwan and other East Asian countries, the potential benefits could be further maximized if Taiwan was included in the process.
Unfortunately, Taiwan does not have a seat at the EAS table. Nevertheless, it has long been a dedicated member of both the PECC and APEC.
That means Taiwan is officially part of the Asia-Pacific cooperation model, regardless of whether it is able to take part in East Asian integration.
Through the simple rule of supply and demand, the current East Asian or Asia-Pacific frameworks have been serving as a foundation to support the global value chain.
When it comes to the global economic system, regional phenomena can easily start a chain reaction. To prevent disasters like the East Asian financial crisis from happening again, countries in this region should realize the significance of economic and financial cooperation.
However, Taiwan does not have many options to choose from. It also has to deal with more constraints than other neighboring countries when trying to optimize its position. Although Japan started the East Asian integration process, the process is now dominated by China.
What should Taiwan's strategy be in response to numerous external constraints like not being invited to the EAS and the risk of being marginalized from the East Asian integration process?
The situation for Taiwan is complicated, but the solution can be simple.
Taiwan should never mistake the existing constraints as all the variables in the equation. It needs to place greater emphasis on decisions that can be made by Taiwan.
Decisions over which Taiwan has no influence are external constraints. To further simplify my argument, Taiwan can stop paying so much attention to the East Asian integration process and EAS and instead focus more on relevant Asia-Pacific developments including the PECC, APEC and the potential Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) region.
Lacking common roots, the idea of East Asian integration can only emerge if East Asians come to share a common vision of the future and are happy with their roles in such a vision.
But the current reality is that East Asia is still far from fulfilling that vision. On the other hand, the Asia-Pacific cooperation model is gradually becoming a reality. If opportunities for participation don't exist in one arena, Taiwan should allocate its valuable resources on feasible mechanisms.
Darson Chiu is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS