On Nov. 22, the Public Television Service (PTS) Directors and Supervisors Review Committee -- elected by the legislature -- passed nominations for the PTS' fourth board of directors and supervisors.
On close examination of the procedure for selecting candidates for the PTS board, which is responsible for the development of the domestic film and television industries, it's clear the decision-making process is absurd.
After the list with director and supervisor nominees was published, some nominees said that they didn't even know they had been put on the list. The press release published by the Government Information Office (GIO) on Nov. 22 said that the GIO would first investigate whether the people nominated by the Review Committee were interested in the position before asking the Cabinet to officially appoint them. In other words, in drawing up the list, the GIO didn't even ask the nominees if they were interested.
This was a waste of time and shows disregard for the importance of the task and a profound lack of respect for the people involved. The list had to be double-checked because if any nominee does not want the job, the committee must come up with a replacement candidate.
In addition, the list of nominees included people who in the past publicly opposed the establishment of the Taiwan Broadcasting System (TBS). For these people to be nominated by the Cabinet for the board of directors and supervisors -- and for them to pass the review by the legislative committee -- sounds like a bad joke.
Why would the Cabinet even compile a list with TBS opponents? What are the legislature's review criteria and procedures? None of this is clear.
The Review Committee set up by the legislature is supposed to consist of impartial private individuals, yet includes two legislators. This greatly diminishes the impartiality of the review process. Even though these two legislators are highly regarded and would perhaps be able to exercise their duties impartially, it is unacceptable to nominate a sitting legislator as an impartial private individual.
In 2001, then New Party legislator Hsieh Chi-ta (
There have also been reports that some people skipped review meetings, while others left in protest of the fact that they were not given the list of nominees prior to the meeting, which would have allowed time for necessary preparations.
Finally, the background of some of the nominees has led to skepticism about the impartiality of the review process.
On the whole, as is stipulated in the Public Television Act (
But because of the grave problems with the review process, we cannot be sure that the new directors will identify with the idea of a public broadcasting system or that the director will have the determination to defend the value of public broadcasting.
The Cabinet and legislature must explain the details of the review process and explain the justification for seemingly inappropriate nominations.
The Cabinet and legislature also need to amend the Act and improve the board director nomination and review process, organizational responsibility and other issues.
Labor representatives should also be put on the board to protect labor rights and ensure the spirit of democracy in the workplace.
More transparency is a must for the upcoming chairman election and selection of the PTS president.
Anyone interested in the positions should be ready to explain publicly why they would be suited to the job and what goals they would work for.
A good candidate must be ready to push for amendments to the Public Television Law (公共電視法), integrate TBS, resist interference by outside forces, protect the values of public broadcasting and include more social forces in the planning and monitoring of the development of public broadcasting media. When looking for a president, the process should be public and transparent and the opinions of people working for TBS should be respected.
Kuan Chung-hsiang is president of Media Watch and assistant professor at the Department of Radio, Television and Film at Shih Hsin University. Lo Shih-hung is convener of the Campaign for Media Reform and associate professor in the Department of Communications at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused