Of the six leading Republican and Democratic contenders for presidential nominations, only Republican Senator John McCain and Democratic former senator John Edwards have produced comprehensive policies toward Asia that each would implement if elected to the White House.
Two more, Democratic Senator Hillary Clinton and former Republican governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney have sketched out proposals for approaches to Asia. The last two, former New York mayor, Rudy Giuliani, a Republican, and Democratic Senator Barack Obama have said little about this issue.
McCain's plan, laid out in an essay in the journal Foreign Affairs, is perhaps the most extensive.
"Power in the world today is moving east; the Asia-Pacific region is on the rise," he wrote.
Moreover, "The linch pin to the region's promise is continued American engagement," he said.
"I welcome Japan's international leadership and emergence as a global power," he said.
He supports Japan's effort to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council alongside Britain, China, France, Russia and the US. He would encourage a partnership with India, a stronger alliance with Australia and would rebuild frayed relations with South Korea.
McCain, however, is cautious about China: "Dealing with a rising China will be a central challenge for the next American president."
On the sensitive issue of Taiwan, McCain says: "When China threatens democratic Taiwan with a massive arsenal of missiles and warlike rhetoric, the United States must take note."
The senator would seek an "elevated partnership" with Indonesia and would "expand defense cooperation" with Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Vietnam. That last is intriguing since McCain, a naval aviator shot down over North Vietnam during the Vietnam war, spent five-and-a-half years as a prisoner of war and was brutally beaten many times.
Edwards is not so detailed as McCain but more sweeping than opponents within his party. Overall, he says on a Web site, the US must "strive to maintain our strong partnerships with longtime allies, including the United Kingdom, Japan and the transforming European Union."
Edwards says US relations with China are "delicate."
"China's influence and importance will only continue to grow" and asserts that "our overarching goal must be to get China to commit to the rules that govern the conduct of nations," he said.
On India, Edwards said: "The United States and India are natural allies, and the US-Indian strategic partnership will help shape the twenty-first century."
He advocates reforming the UN to include a place for India on the Security Council.
Clinton has stirred discussion in Asia with a declaration about China that is at odds with the views of many other US politicians.
"Our relationship with China," she said in an essay in Foreign Affairs, "will be the most important bilateral relationship in the world in this century."
In contrast, her husband, former US president Bill Clinton, reflected a widespread view among both Democrats and Republicans.
While he was in the White House, he said: "The United States has no more important bilateral relationship than our relationship with Japan. We are strategic allies and our futures are bound up together."
Moreover, Senator Clinton said: "We must persuade China to join global institutions."
Yet the CIA's World Factbook reports that China, one of five nations with a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, belongs to about 70 international organizations. (In comparison, the US belongs to about 80.)
In another surprising statement, Senator Clinton writes that Kuala Lumpur was one of the "springboards for 9/11," the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.
Yet most reports say Osama bin Laden, a Saudi, and his al-Qaeda followers, also Saudis, as having conspired in Afghanistan to hijack the airliners that crashed into the twin towers in New York and the Pentagon in Washington.
Romney sees Asian nations, particularly China, as economic competitors rather than as security partners or adversaries.
"China and the rest of Asia," he says on his Web site, "are on the move economically and technologically."
He lumps all Asians together despite differences in political systems, economic development and social order, saying: "They are a family oriented, educated, hard-working, and mercantile people."
"If America acts boldly and swiftly, the emergence of Asia will be an opportunity," he said.
Romney's opponents might agree with his concluding thought: "If America fails to act, we will be eclipsed."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS