I have to address two "issues" that have been really annoying me over the last couple of weeks.
The first issue is the Tong-yong vs. Pinyin Romanization system. Both of these are designed for foreigners and not for native Chinese speakers. The problem I have is the disregard policy makers have toward the target audience -- people like me who live here and those who visit here for short periods at a time.
Here is the problem: You are not using the system correctly and therefore it is absolutely impossible to read it so stop using it. Don't use it in passports or roadsigns or anywhere unless you are going to do it correctly.
One down, two points to go. Anyone who studies Chinese usually learns Pinyin, so we all know it. Tongyong is designed to be used by people who have not studied Chinese, but the person would still not be able to pronounce the word correctly because they would not know which tone to use.
Maybe the powers that be should stop attracting new foreigners to Taiwan and start looking after those of us who have made this country their home. Can we vote on it in a phonetics referendum? I vote Pinyin and so does every other person I know who has been living here for more than a year and has studied some Chinese.
The second issue involves the comments in another recent article ("Disparities plague English classes," Nov. 12, page 2). If a student doesn't know how to do addition and subtraction in math class, he should not be studying algebra and a student who knows algebra very well should not be studying basic addition and subtraction.
They should be in separate classes and if they are not you are wasting the money of those who pay for an education and you are wasting the time of educators who actually care to teach and not just pop into Taiwan for a short-term working holiday.
The problem is that the majority of teachers who teach English have no idea if they are teaching correct or incorrect English. They are either wrong out of ignorance, or they have no choice other than to guess. This applies to teachers from elementary school all the way up. They don't care if the students are in similar or different classes. Those that do and can actually teach are just caught up in the system.
The only reason I care is because you are confusing students and making them negative about learning English or Chinese.
I have a student who corrected her elementary school teacher when she said "a pear and a peach are the same thing when translated into Chinese." This student was punished for "interrupting" the teacher. That falls into the "retarded" category.
Let's get this organized and start caring about what English and Chinese students achieve more than our own egos.
Gerhard Erasmus
Yonghe, Taipei County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry