The prominent "UN for Taiwan" poster hanging outside the Taipei Main Station is not surprising, considering the popularity of the UN bid. However, as English has not become the official language of Taiwan, it naturally targets a foreign audience. If we are to step out into the world, we obviously must broadcast to the world. Yet, how many foreigners -- especially European and North Americans -- are actually in Taiwan? Does the government agency responsible for the sign know the figures?
Over the past decade I have traveled to Europe every year or so on KLM, and each trip has been a cause for sorrow. During high summer, the flights are packed each way. Seats between Amsterdam and Taipei are difficult to acquire even in September, with economy class packed to capacity.
Ten hours after leaving Amsterdam, the plane makes a brief stop in Bangkok, journey's end for most of the tourists on the flight. Those who re-embark are mostly Taiwanese. At Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport the disembarkation is desolate, with few foreigners and many businessmen. Just before reaching customs, passengers pass duty-free sales persons pitching alcohol and tobacco. The merchants' plight deserves sympathy, though I have seldom witnessed such scenarios in the airports of Europe or China.
The Tourism Bureau recently admitted that Taiwan is not attracting tourists. Because of a continuing decline of tourist arrivals in Taiwan, the bureau intends to reduce the target of next year's "Double Tourism Plan" by 4 million, with an expected loss of NT$10 billion (US$310 million) to NT$20 billion for the local tourism industry.
Those who frequently travel abroad may have already noticed that Taiwan does not exist on the world tourism map. Western travel agencies provide packages to South Korea, Japan, Thailand and other Asian countries, but not Taiwan. Tourists are not interested in Taiwan, and well-known hotel chains such as the Marriott have established themselves in Beijing and Shanghai, but not here. The Hilton chain, with 2,800 locations worldwide, pulled out of Taiwan several years ago.
What is the problem? Of course promotions must be reinforced, but not only by employing Yankee pitcher Wang Chien-ming (王建民) or boy music group F4 as spokespersons. Although a well-known tourism magazine in the US recently announced that Taiwan's scenery is beautiful, do we really believe that we have such a beautiful island? Who would come here just to see the National Palace Museum, Taipei 101, Taroko National Park, or to taste night market delicacies? Our public facilities are just third-world standard, while our natural environment cannot compare with that of Thailand or Malaysia.
Taiwanese architecture is represented by a horribly tacky amalgamation of metallic windows, water towers and ceramic tiles. A couple of years ago, a Japanese tourist's open criticism of Puli Township (
Years of traveling have confirmed that even if Taiwan is not a member of the UN, its passport-holders can still travel the world, while citizens of the "peacefully rising" China -- a member of the UN Security Council -- still have difficulty obtaining European visas. As a tourist, I have never felt that my nation's dignity was under attack. Yet, the fact that foreigners are unwilling to come to Taiwan still brings a sense of isolation and unease.
Those who are working on the hopeless bid to join the UN while crying "I love Taiwan" slogans should perhaps consider why Taiwan has vanished from the map of world tourism.
Huang Jui-ming is an associate professor of law at Providence University.
Translated by Angela Hong
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS