Rising global oil prices have brought the issues of domestic gasoline prices and energy conservation firmly into the political spotlight this week.
Some rather foolish comments from Minister of Economic Affairs Steve Chen (
Opposition lawmakers, of course, then had a field day, revealing the gas-guzzling nature of the cars used by many top government officials.
But while Chen and his fellow Cabinet members deserved the criticism, it is doubtful that any of the opposition legislators who kicked up the fuss could honestly say that they take the MRT to the legislature or drive around in a Nissan March.
Reckless consumption of natural resources is an outrage that almost everyone in Taiwan -- both businesses and individuals -- is guilty of. This is why per capita carbon-dioxide emissions in the nation are the third-highest in the world and three times the global average.
This is a result of decades of unchecked industrial development, as well as vastly under-priced gasoline, gas and electricity.
But rising prices are a global problem, and not the fault of the government.
Oil is a finite natural resource that is in great demand and, as existing stocks are being exhausted faster than new ones come online, the price of oil is only going to keep rising.
Prices hit US$96 yesterday and it is highly unlikely that prices will ever return to the US$20 per barrel average of the 1980s and 1990s. It cannot be long before the price breaks three figures.
The opposition has proposed a price freeze until the end of the year, but that will only make things more complicated if oil prices keep rising. A freeze will just serve to shelter the public from reality and encourage them to keep up their wasteful habits.
High prices may help people economize in the short term, but education on ways to reduce consumption is a far more effective long-term approach. But for this kind of campaign to be effective, the nation's politicians must lead by example. Something they have so far failed to do.
Considering the dire warnings that have been emanating from the scientific community about the severity of global warming and the catastrophes it is likely to bring to island nations like Taiwan, one would think tackling consumption and reducing greenhouse gas emissions would be a top priority for lawmakers across the political spectrum.
Unfortunately this is not the case.
Because while the government is certainly not doing enough to reduce the nation's dependence on imported fossil fuels, the opposition -- with its promises of more breakneck development -- doesn't seem capable of tackling the problem either.
Wouldn't it be refreshing if the nation's two main political blocs could, for once, put aside their petty squabbling and focus their efforts on coming up with an effective plan to tackle these important issues?
A scheme that would ensure continued prosperity while reducing gas emissions and irresponsible consumption of natural resources is a necessity, not an option.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with