Rising global oil prices have brought the issues of domestic gasoline prices and energy conservation firmly into the political spotlight this week.
Some rather foolish comments from Minister of Economic Affairs Steve Chen (
Opposition lawmakers, of course, then had a field day, revealing the gas-guzzling nature of the cars used by many top government officials.
But while Chen and his fellow Cabinet members deserved the criticism, it is doubtful that any of the opposition legislators who kicked up the fuss could honestly say that they take the MRT to the legislature or drive around in a Nissan March.
Reckless consumption of natural resources is an outrage that almost everyone in Taiwan -- both businesses and individuals -- is guilty of. This is why per capita carbon-dioxide emissions in the nation are the third-highest in the world and three times the global average.
This is a result of decades of unchecked industrial development, as well as vastly under-priced gasoline, gas and electricity.
But rising prices are a global problem, and not the fault of the government.
Oil is a finite natural resource that is in great demand and, as existing stocks are being exhausted faster than new ones come online, the price of oil is only going to keep rising.
Prices hit US$96 yesterday and it is highly unlikely that prices will ever return to the US$20 per barrel average of the 1980s and 1990s. It cannot be long before the price breaks three figures.
The opposition has proposed a price freeze until the end of the year, but that will only make things more complicated if oil prices keep rising. A freeze will just serve to shelter the public from reality and encourage them to keep up their wasteful habits.
High prices may help people economize in the short term, but education on ways to reduce consumption is a far more effective long-term approach. But for this kind of campaign to be effective, the nation's politicians must lead by example. Something they have so far failed to do.
Considering the dire warnings that have been emanating from the scientific community about the severity of global warming and the catastrophes it is likely to bring to island nations like Taiwan, one would think tackling consumption and reducing greenhouse gas emissions would be a top priority for lawmakers across the political spectrum.
Unfortunately this is not the case.
Because while the government is certainly not doing enough to reduce the nation's dependence on imported fossil fuels, the opposition -- with its promises of more breakneck development -- doesn't seem capable of tackling the problem either.
Wouldn't it be refreshing if the nation's two main political blocs could, for once, put aside their petty squabbling and focus their efforts on coming up with an effective plan to tackle these important issues?
A scheme that would ensure continued prosperity while reducing gas emissions and irresponsible consumption of natural resources is a necessity, not an option.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS