With an abundance of stern rhetoric in the run-up to yesterday's torch relay staged by the central government, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
While the Sports Affairs Council (SAC) considered the torch relay a sports event, meaning it did not need to apply for a permit from the city government, Hau insisted the event was a political activity -- for which a permit was needed -- and said that police would arrest anyone taking part in the event if no prior permission was granted.
The dispute was resolved after the Chinese Taipei Road Running Association applied for a permit on the SAC's behalf at the last minute. The association also noted that the case had set a precedent, as a permit had never before been required for a running event.
Unfortunately, while Hau was spouting his political rhetoric his administration was proved incompetent when it came to performing its duties during yesterday's events in Taipei.
The central government's 1,200km torch relay to promote the country's bid to join the UN started in the morning with President Chen Shui-bian (
Simultaneously, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held a cycling event nearby. Led by KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
While it was pragmatic of the two camps to plan their routes in such a way as to minimize the risk of a confrontation between the participants, the city government failed in its efforts to keep the peace and maintain traffic flow for commuters.
Scuffles broke out when torch relay participants encountered sporadic provocation from members of the pro-communist Chinese Unification Alliance (
Granted, the two camps could have avoided causing inconvenience to Taipei commuters by staging their respective events on a weekend instead of on a working day, and Hau's administration cannot be blamed entirely for the actions of the Chinese Unification Alliance members.
However, by allowing both the DPP and the KMT's events to be held on the same day, the city government was saying it was confident the police could handle the two events and control the situation.
Given yesterday's events, it would be better for the mayor to spend more time and energy on his job and less time barracking for his party.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past