With an abundance of stern rhetoric in the run-up to yesterday's torch relay staged by the central government, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
While the Sports Affairs Council (SAC) considered the torch relay a sports event, meaning it did not need to apply for a permit from the city government, Hau insisted the event was a political activity -- for which a permit was needed -- and said that police would arrest anyone taking part in the event if no prior permission was granted.
The dispute was resolved after the Chinese Taipei Road Running Association applied for a permit on the SAC's behalf at the last minute. The association also noted that the case had set a precedent, as a permit had never before been required for a running event.
Unfortunately, while Hau was spouting his political rhetoric his administration was proved incompetent when it came to performing its duties during yesterday's events in Taipei.
The central government's 1,200km torch relay to promote the country's bid to join the UN started in the morning with President Chen Shui-bian (
Simultaneously, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held a cycling event nearby. Led by KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
While it was pragmatic of the two camps to plan their routes in such a way as to minimize the risk of a confrontation between the participants, the city government failed in its efforts to keep the peace and maintain traffic flow for commuters.
Scuffles broke out when torch relay participants encountered sporadic provocation from members of the pro-communist Chinese Unification Alliance (
Granted, the two camps could have avoided causing inconvenience to Taipei commuters by staging their respective events on a weekend instead of on a working day, and Hau's administration cannot be blamed entirely for the actions of the Chinese Unification Alliance members.
However, by allowing both the DPP and the KMT's events to be held on the same day, the city government was saying it was confident the police could handle the two events and control the situation.
Given yesterday's events, it would be better for the mayor to spend more time and energy on his job and less time barracking for his party.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS