A few days ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
But an analysis of the paper leaves one frustrated. Given the KMT's wealth of political talent and that Ma is a Harvard law graduate, one could have expected a global perspective that measures up to international standards of governance.
So why is his white paper on Aboriginal policy superficial and short-sighted, as if Aborigines were of no importance?
Ma's policy shows no sense of integration with the international community. On Sept. 13, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which concerns all the indigenous peoples of the world, was adopted by the UN General Assembly. The fact that Ma -- more than a month later -- did not include this declaration in his white paper highlights his ignorance and indifference to Aboriginal issues, as well as his campaign team's laziness and carelessness.
Ma seems to be treating Aboriginal people as if he were still the mayor of Taipei.
At first glance, his proposal seems filled with preferential treatment, but it all turns out to be discriminatory colonialism encouraging the assimilation of Aborigines.
Many of the proposals could be implemented by the Council of Indigenous Peoples' education/culture and health departments, and many are indeed being implemented or are in the planning stages.
The white paper proposes self-determination for Aboriginal peoples, but it is a "self-determination" that is not based in self-governance. Ma wants to force Aborigines to accept the government's "good laws and good intentions." This approach has long been criticized elsewhere in the world. Furthermore, the key to Aboriginal self-determination is land -- one of the most important Aboriginal rights.
Unfortunately, the word "land" is not mentioned once in the white paper. What kind of self-determination is that without land?
The paper doesn't even clearly mention the enactment of sub-laws to the Aboriginal Basic Law (原住民基本法), the most important part of the project of codifying the rights of Aboriginal peoples.
It makes one wonder if Ma is preparing to run for president or for mayor of Taipei all over again.
In his essay "Politics as a Vocation," German economist and sociologist Max Weber suggested a distinction between politicians whose interest is more non-vocational in nature and those who pursue politics as a career.
The former are eager to seize power and selectively advocate issues that serve their own purposes. Such politicians can manipulate the public by accustoming it to pursuing short-term benefits.
Ma is committing this mistake by only proposing short-term goals -- such as building bridges and constructing roads -- to cater to Aborigines while avoiding discussion of long-term sustainable development that can safeguard the dignity and self-determination of indigenous communities.
I hope our political leaders can be "vocational politicians" and offer policies that are capable of touching the hearts of Aborigines, and who can then implement these policies step by step.
Better that than adopting short-sighted tactics to placate Aboriginal people and making "policy" suggestions that show no interest whatsoever in Aboriginal issues.
Isak Afo is a member of the Amis tribe and spokesperson of the Taiwan Indigenous Association.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China