The controversy over Taiwan's UN bid caused US National Security Council senior director for East Asian affairs Dennis Wilder to say in late August that "Taiwan, or the Republic of China [ROC], is not at this point a state in the international community."
Conversely, Washington also said it did not accept the UN's view that Taiwan is a part of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Both moves created quite a stir.
But the claim made by some political commentators in Taiwan that this marked the first time the US had objected to the claim that Taiwan is part of the PRC is a misleading one.
Even after the US severed diplomatic ties with Taipei, the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) underscored Washington's denial of the PRC's claim. Former US president Ronald Reagan's "Six Assurances," delivered in person by US representative to Taiwan James Lilly to president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) on July 14, 1982, before the signing of the US-PRC Joint Communique on Arms Sales, clearly stated that the US does not support Chinese claims of sovereignty over Taiwan.
On Oct. 3, the Heritage Foundation, a US-based conservative think tank, held a seminar in Washington titled "President Reagan's Six Assurances to Taiwan and their Meaning Today." Former Control Yuan president Fredrick Chien (
Sources say that former US deputy assistant secretary of defense for Asia and the Pacific Kurt Campbell and former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush also support Schriver's proposal.
In his article, Schriver points out that calls from Taiwanese officials for Washington to reaffirm its six assurances are not very useful as the situation has changed drastically in the last 25 years. Over the past three years in particular, "trust between the US and Taiwan has weakened. Thus, there is a need today for a strong, clear statement from a senior US official that will move us toward genuine reassurance," Schriver wrote.
Schriver's six assurances no longer refer to the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan.
Assurances that remain from the past include the position that the US would not pressure Taiwan to enter into negotiations with the PRC and that the US will always honor the TRA. Some relatively fresh points include the fifth assurance, which stipulates that "Under no circumstances will the US seek to curry favor with China by making sacrifices in its relationship with Taiwan ... The US will not agree to `co-manage' the issue of Taiwan with the PRC" and the sixth assurance, which says that "The US will seek to promote opportunities for Taiwan to participate meaningfully in international organizations."
The fourth assurance, however, is confusing, as it states that "The US will not formally recognize the PRC's sovereignty over Taiwan."
Does this mean Washington would grant informal recognition to PRC sovereignty over Taiwan? The same assurance also states that "Issues related to the sovereignty of Taiwan are for the people of the PRC and the people of Taiwan to decide peacefully themselves."
Although Schriver's intentions are good, his fourth assurance seems to be a major step backward.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica's Institute of Modern History.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations