The controversy over Taiwan's UN bid caused US National Security Council senior director for East Asian affairs Dennis Wilder to say in late August that "Taiwan, or the Republic of China [ROC], is not at this point a state in the international community."
Conversely, Washington also said it did not accept the UN's view that Taiwan is a part of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Both moves created quite a stir.
But the claim made by some political commentators in Taiwan that this marked the first time the US had objected to the claim that Taiwan is part of the PRC is a misleading one.
Even after the US severed diplomatic ties with Taipei, the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) underscored Washington's denial of the PRC's claim. Former US president Ronald Reagan's "Six Assurances," delivered in person by US representative to Taiwan James Lilly to president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) on July 14, 1982, before the signing of the US-PRC Joint Communique on Arms Sales, clearly stated that the US does not support Chinese claims of sovereignty over Taiwan.
On Oct. 3, the Heritage Foundation, a US-based conservative think tank, held a seminar in Washington titled "President Reagan's Six Assurances to Taiwan and their Meaning Today." Former Control Yuan president Fredrick Chien (
Sources say that former US deputy assistant secretary of defense for Asia and the Pacific Kurt Campbell and former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush also support Schriver's proposal.
In his article, Schriver points out that calls from Taiwanese officials for Washington to reaffirm its six assurances are not very useful as the situation has changed drastically in the last 25 years. Over the past three years in particular, "trust between the US and Taiwan has weakened. Thus, there is a need today for a strong, clear statement from a senior US official that will move us toward genuine reassurance," Schriver wrote.
Schriver's six assurances no longer refer to the issue of US arms sales to Taiwan.
Assurances that remain from the past include the position that the US would not pressure Taiwan to enter into negotiations with the PRC and that the US will always honor the TRA. Some relatively fresh points include the fifth assurance, which stipulates that "Under no circumstances will the US seek to curry favor with China by making sacrifices in its relationship with Taiwan ... The US will not agree to `co-manage' the issue of Taiwan with the PRC" and the sixth assurance, which says that "The US will seek to promote opportunities for Taiwan to participate meaningfully in international organizations."
The fourth assurance, however, is confusing, as it states that "The US will not formally recognize the PRC's sovereignty over Taiwan."
Does this mean Washington would grant informal recognition to PRC sovereignty over Taiwan? The same assurance also states that "Issues related to the sovereignty of Taiwan are for the people of the PRC and the people of Taiwan to decide peacefully themselves."
Although Schriver's intentions are good, his fourth assurance seems to be a major step backward.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica's Institute of Modern History.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
RSS