The political infighting started by the resignation of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Yu Shyi-kun and the negative effect this had on presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (謝長廷) campaign has sabotaged DPP unity.
Initially, Yu offered to step down on Sept. 21 for allegedly misusing his special allowance fund.
However, after his failure to convince other DPP leaders to accept a "Normal Country" draft resolution that "the nation should correct its name and write a new constitution as soon as possible," Yu resigned and accused other DPP big shots -- including President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) -- of chickening out on matters of name rectification and on rewriting the Constitution.
Yu expressed his dissatisfaction over a modified version accepted by all other leaders which suggested that the nation should "accomplish rectification of `Taiwan' as soon as possible and write a new constitution."
Yu's maneuvering is aimed at furthering his own personal interests at the expense of the party's effort to retain power in the next presidential election.
First, Yu's more radical approach would further endanger US-Taiwan relations.
The US has reiterated its warning to Chen that his plans to hold a referendum on using the name "Taiwan" to join the UN is an apparent move to unilaterally change the cross-strait "status quo" and is therefore a violation of US policy and Chen's commitment to not change Taiwan's national title hold a independence referendum.
In response to US pressures, Chen has argued that the referendum does not amount to changing the national title or seeking independence.
Using the name "Republic of China" would have violated his "four noes" pledge instead, he said. Chen is well aware of the seriousness of his "four noes" pledge.
But if the DPP had passed the original version of the resolution proposed by Yu and his supporters, it would have put Chen in a dire situation.
Not to mention that with Chen taking over the DPP chairmanship, it would have been very hard for him to justify his stance while reacting to US pressures.
He would have no choice but to implement the party resolution of changing the national title to "Taiwan."
Second, Yu's insistence would also have had a negative impact on Hsieh's campaign which centers on reconciliation and coexistence with China.
In order to win over swing voters, Hsieh has introduced a moderate and bipartisan strategy as a way of broadening his appeal.
Endorsing Chen's referendum agenda has displayed Hsieh's strong determination to safeguard the notion of "Taiwan-centric" consciousness.
Hsieh has also recognized the importance of writing a new constitution in the near future in accordance with constitutional procedure.
Therefore, the new resolution passed by party representatives will have a huge influence on Hsieh's policy.
Judging by how the international community -- and especially the US -- would likely have responded to Yu's version of "one resolution," it is necessary for Hsieh to stick to his guns.
Finally and most importantly, it is Hsieh who won the DPP primary and obtained the presidential nomination.
What made Yu's resolution even less legitimate is the fact that he lost to Hsieh by a wide margin in the primary.
Why should a winner of the primary have accepted a resolution manipulated largely by a loser?
The whole fiasco must stop now.
To win the support of the majority, the DPP must stand firm on guarding Taiwan's independent sovereignty and demonstrate responsibility and unity.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s