To understand what has Filipinos such as Jose de Venecia so incensed these days you can try dissecting a complicated deal between his government and China's ZTE Corp.
Or, you could just skim Transparency International's latest take on corruption. It's sober reading and speaks volumes about why many Filipinos, and Asians in general, aren't benefiting much from the region's boom.
The Philippines is a case in point. It slid to 131st place in this year's corruption perceptions index, putting it in the same league as Burundi, Honduras and Yemen. Last year the Philippines was ranked 121st compared with 117th in 2005.
Philippine President Gloria Arroyo would no doubt dispute these findings. Her message these days is of revival and fiscal sobriety. With the economy growing 7.5 percent and the budget in surplus for a third consecutive month in August, Arroyo argues that things are looking up in her nation of 91 million people.
De Venecia's case helps explain why such optimism is more spin than reality.
The 44-year-old businessman was bidding on a state Internet project. In provocative Senate hearings in Manila last week, De Venecia explained how the president's husband, Jose Miguel Arroyo, told him to "back off" in favor of a rival working with ZTE, China's biggest publicly traded telephone-equipment maker.
SCANDALS GALORE
A former official, Romulo Neri, says he was offered a 200 million peso (US$4.4 million) bribe by Commission on Elections Chairman Benjamin Abalos when they discussed the deal. That allegation, denied by Abalos, thickened the plot because Arroyo is still under suspicion for allegedly conspiring with commission officials to rig the 2004 election.
The ZTE scandal is dominating the Philippines, lowering Arroyo's already dismal approval ratings and sparking coup rumors. All this is a bit too familiar; Arroyo herself became president after Joseph Estrada was ousted in 2001 amid popular demonstrations backed by the military.
Estrada's downfall was corruption. On Sept. 12, he was convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Arroyo's economic-revival story isn't getting across partly because scandals are drowning her out. Yet the bigger reason is a justified sense of skepticism that even if the economy is improving, most Filipinos won't enjoy it.
Corruption is a key reason why, and a lack of progress in combating it remains a major blight on Asia's post-1997 crisis restructuring efforts.
Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Macau, Myanmar, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam also lost ground this year, according to Berlin-based Transparency International. The strong correlation between corruption and poverty means the benefits of growth are concentrated among the politically connected and bypass many who most need it.
SUCCESS STORIES
There were pockets of success that shouldn't go unnoticed by investors. Pakistan rose to 138th place this year versus 142nd last year and 144th in 2005. A slight improvement was seen in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore, while Japan, Mongolia and Taiwan held steady over the last 12 months.
Yet the broader trend in Asia is discouraging. The Philippines, for example, hasn't been able to bring the Marcos family to justice 21 years after former president Ferdinand Marcos was ousted . Indonesia has had no more luck taking former president Suharto to task.
Lawyers for both dictators earlier this month rejected a UN report that they embezzled as much as US$45 billion. Suharto allegedly stole as much as US$35 billion, averaging 1.3 percent a year of Indonesia's GDP during his 32-year reign. Marcos allegedly took as much as US$10 billion over two decades, or an annual average of 4.5 percent of GDP.
Asia doesn't have a monopoly on dodgy dealings. Anyone making that argument can be quickly defused by the mention of names like Enron Corp or Parmalat. Yet even with its high growth rates and buoyant stock markets, Asia is home to roughly two-thirds of the world's poor.
Making matters worse are signs that the region's rich-poor divide is widening. In a report last month, the Manila-based Asian Development Bank (ADB) concluded that Asia's rich are growing wealthier much faster than the poor are climbing out of poverty.
The buzz in Asia is how well things are progressing 10 years after the region's financial crisis. In 15 of 21 countries the ADB studied, income inequality has increased.
GROWING INEQUITIES
"The rise in inequality we see in Asia today constitutes a clear and present danger to the sustained growth of Asian countries,'' says Ifzal Ali, the ADB's chief economist.
As history has shown in Asia, growing inequality could lead to social conflicts from street demonstrations to violence. The pro-democracy protesters mounting the biggest challenge to Myanmar's military regime since 1988 are a case in point.
Inequality also matters because multinational companies are relying on Asia's emerging middle class to buy their goods and services.
If the phenomenon holds back Asian economies, the fallout will be felt by corporate executives a world away.
Disparity is the ugly underbelly of prosperity in Asia, and something to which both governments and investors need to pay more attention.
William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS