President Chen Shui-bian (
Investigations, legal reviews and verdicts involving politicians have been questioned by both the pan-blue and pan-green camps, leading to much criticism about unfairness and political intervention in the process. As a result, the public has once again begun to call for judicial reform.
Among other things, judicial reform should be based in how judicial officials are selected. Changing the attitudes and behavior of the large number of existing judicial officials is a difficult project.
A faster and more effective road to judicial reform is to ensure that the grand justices who lead the system have a solid professional grounding. Bringing about change among other judges and prosecutors starts with this.
Eight new grand justices are about to be appointed, together with a new Judicial Yuan president and vice president. This is a rare opportunity for reform.
It is crucial that these appointments are not blocked like the Control Yuan appointments were. Nor should legislators use political motives to appoint unfit candidates who will block judicial reform.
Before legislators vote for the nominees, a few flaws in the process must be pointed out.
First, the legislature's hearings have been excessively political in nature, with pan-blue legislators asking a few supposedly pro-green-camp nominees questions about their relationships with the president and their opinions of Minister of Education Tu Cheng-sheng (
These legislators wasted a precious opportunity to inquire about the nominees' legal education, trial experience, record of decisions and views on upcoming judicial issues.
Second, although the grand justice nominee review and the nomination of Control Yuan members differ in timing and in the nature of the positions, the two issues have merged in light of political competition and skulduggery.
The pan-blue camp will only pass the grand justice nominations in exchange for the passage of its Control Yuan nomination list, while the pan-green camp will only pass the Control Yuan list if the passage of their grand justice list is guaranteed. This has turned the review into a bargaining chip for backstage negotiations.
Due to the lack of trust between the two camps, the technical issue of whether the nominees should be voted for individually or as a group has degenerated into a source of conflict.
The grand justices are the protectors of the Constitution and have the potential to initiate judicial reform. As the legislature will vote on the nominations tomorrow, legislators need to understand that partisan political concerns should have no bearing on whether or not the nominees as a group should be confirmed.
The new grand justices and the Judicial Yuan's president and vice president must acknowledge the public's wish for an independent judiciary and reform. It's time for the judiciary to look to a truly independent future, not the politically yoked past.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS