The security environment since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the US demonstrates the limits of the ability of the UN and the US -- the world's sole military superpower -- to maintain international security. However, like-minded middle-level powers with similar intentions could complement what the UN or the US lacks, effectively generating sufficient clout to stabilize the global security environment.
Japan, Australia, Germany and Canada may be just such powers. They share common values as free and democratic countries. Moreover, they are non-nuclear powers with no permanent seats on the UN Security Council.
All are long time allies of the US and in recent years have had many opportunities to demonstrate their ability and willingness to contribute to international security if called upon. They all also share a recognition that global stability directly serves their own national interests.
Nevertheless, subtle differences among these countries may influence their bilateral cooperation or coordination with the UN or the US. As a result, they must compliment each other's advantages, characteristics and interests in order to optimize their role in promoting international security.
For years, Japan has taken only cautious steps into this area. However, in March Japan agreed to enter an alliance with Australia and issued a Communique on Japan-Australia Security Cooperation.
In early June, the two countries' defense and foreign ministers held the first regular security meeting, the so-called two-plus-two meeting in Tokyo, agreeing to promote defense cooperation in various fields, including international security.
Under Japan's last two prime ministers, the country has steadily been making practical contributions to the stabilization of the international security environment as a way to benefit its national and international interests. Japan is thus helping to create conditions to allow middle-level powers to act jointly and effectively to provide an essential international "public good."
Such practical proposals address key global issues, including international terrorism; strengthening of mechanisms for arms control, arms reduction and non-proliferation; efforts to contain attempts by North Korea and Iran to develop nuclear weapons; encouraging transparency in China's military; restraining Russia's imperial ambitions and building a global ballistic missile defense network against missiles that could be launched by rogue regimes.
However, efforts to promote this kind of cooperation should not be confined to these middle-level powers. There are many other potential middle-level democratic countries that should take part. Various approaches may be available for building a coalition of such powers, including the use of the UN and seeking to influence US foreign policy.
To advance such efforts, Japan, Canada, Australia and Germany could strengthen ties with other like-minded middle-level countries that possess nuclear weapons and hold permanent seats on the UN Security Council, such as the UK and France, or with smaller nuclear powers without permanent Security Council seats like India.
Once such a coalition gains a sure footing, the next step would be to participate actively in the negotiation of major security issues such as international arms control, arms reduction and non-proliferation, while encouraging the involvement of China and Russia. The goal should be to build and exercise influence within the international community to the point that the coalition becomes tantamount to a permanent "sixth" member of the UN Security Council.
Hideaki Kaneda is a retired vice admiral and former chief of Japan's Self-Defense Forces and is director of the Okazaki Institute in Tokyo.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS