With the 62nd session of the UN General Assembly opening in New York on Tuesday, the General Committee was expected to meet yesterday to finalize the agenda and decide whether Taiwan's UN membership bid should be included as a supplementary item for discussion.
While UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon seemed to give the item a more positive spin yesterday -- he said he hoped the issue would be deliberated on -- it remains unlikely that the assembly will afford due process to Taiwan's application.
After 14 years of failure, this is the first time the government has applied for UN membership under the name "Taiwan," a departure from the practice of using the formal title "Republic of China."
Another bout of disappointment notwithstanding, Taiwan is to some degree better off this year in its pursuit of a UN seat.
For the truth is that national identification among ordinary people has strengthened, and this includes referring to "Taiwan" as a state. This is evident from polls pointing to a comfortable percentage of people identifying themselves with Taiwan and expressing support for a referendum on the nation's UN bid.
As noted by Government Information Office Minister Shieh Jhy-wey (
The more Taiwan speaks to the international community, the better it can demonstrate that it and China are separate countries.
And Chinese officials are welcome to deliver incensed responses. The more ridiculous and strident their comments, the more credibility Taiwan secures and the more unifying the effect on all Taiwanese.
Such was the case in a Danish newspaper report, in which a Chinese diplomat claimed that: "According to the Cairo Declaration [1943] and the Potsdam Proclamation [1945], Taiwan is part of the People's Republic of China." This only ended up drawing the reader's attention to the extraordinary ability of Chinese propagandists to backdate the founding of the People's Republic of China.
Even so, it appears China has had success in driving a wedge between Taiwan and the US by pressuring the latter to oppose the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government's proposed UN referendum. This opposition came in the shape of a certain US official dismissing Taiwan's statehood.
Some breakthrough, until one considers that the Chinese face enormous problems selling this drivel to the Taiwanese man and woman on the street. Until that time, we can expect the Chinese Foreign Ministry to take comfort from the US State Department's attempts to mute the forces of liberty in Taiwan.
The opposition has criticized the DPP administration for making the issue an electoral gambit.
Be that as it may. For the good of Taiwan's long-term interests, the government should press on and further internationalize the issue.
Let the world see how democratic Taiwan is, and how it differs from an autocratic China. Let the world see first-hand how China bullies those who dare to stand up for themselves -- and how easily the UN will fall into step when required.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS