The senior director for East Asian affairs at the US National Security Council (NSC), Dennis Wilder, has said that Taiwan, or the Republic of China (ROC), is not a state in the international community. US State Department officials from the Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs have said Wilder's words are consistent with long-term US policy on Taiwan's statehood. This is not new to those who understand a bit about Taiwan's international position. Instead, it serves as a warning to those who believe that only an absolute faith in the legitimacy of the ROC will allow Taiwan to survive in the international community.
Emotions aside, the US government has indeed exposed the "inconvenient truth" regarding the uncertainty surrounding the issue of Taiwan's sovereignty: That the issue is undecided and has been left undecided for years. The dispute between the pan-green and pan-blue camps over Taiwan's statehood is nothing new.
Seemingly ruthless criticism from the US on Taiwan's pursuit of democracy has provided the Taiwanese with a great opportunity to look at our history and to move toward the right future. We should cool down and think about who we really are.
The Treaty of San Francisco that Japan signed with 48 nations in 1951 and the Treaty of Peace between the ROC and Japan in 1952 clearly stated that Taiwan's statehood was left undefined. While many support the idea that Taiwan has a legal relationship with China, the Formosan Association for Public Affairs confirmed -- after verifying with an official at the Records Services at the US National Archives -- that the 1943 Cairo Declaration that several Chinese officials have used as a basis to bolster their "one China" claims is not legally binding.
There is nothing shameful about admitting that Taiwan's international status is undetermined. On the contrary, it gives us a reason to make our nation a "normal country."
With a presidential election approaching, neither the pan-green camp nor the pan-blue camp is willing at this point to face history honestly, because if they admit that Taiwan's sovereignty is uncertain, they also deny the legitimacy of the election. The Taiwanese might be able to understand this conflict for the time being because of Taiwan's special historical background.
However, do the Taiwanese have a right to demand their future leaders to explicitly promise that Taiwan's statehood will still be undefined in five or even 10 years? The pro-independence pan-green camp probably cannot get away with this question.
The US has declared its position on Taiwan's statehood. Even though this has lifted the veil covering an embarrassing truth, it could serve as a turning point for Taiwanese to unify. This hot potato is a test of the intelligence of Taiwanese politicians.
Liu Shun-Ming is a policy planner at the Government Information Office.
Translated by Ted Yang
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS