When Ilan County Commis-sioner Lu Kuo-hua (
In the Chinshui Water Park, where the festival was held, I saw fallen leaves, twigs and dust floating in a pond, but I didn't see anyone cleaning it up. The wooden floorboards weren't put together evenly -- I was afraid children might stumble and get hurt. The recent typhoon had caused a lot of grass to come loose, and I even saw some strange oil stains. Snacks and drinks sold in the park were very expensive. At the venue for children's games, there were a lot of exhibits, but few children actually playing.
I talked with a visitor at the festival, who said: "There are no children's folk games at the Children's Festival."
I decided to talk to some more visitors, and found that many people felt that the Children's Festival should include more Ilan culture, and that a Children's Festival without local Ilan flavor was no more than a general "water festival."
Is culture so abstract that it can't be included in the festival?
A taxi driver in Lotung (
This reminded me of how the festival came about in the first place. After some Ilan officials went to the Avignon Festival in France, they realized that the income earned in the one month of the festival could support the people of Avignon for an entire year. So after they came back to Taiwan, the started working on putting the festival together. Ilan's tourism bureau owes its very existence to the vision of the county government. The government initiated two key events -- The Children's Festival and the Folk Dance Art Festival -- and the rest is history.
The success of the festival made Ilan very proud, and it allowed the pan-green government to announce that it "guaranteed quality." Now the government says it wants to stop organizing the festival. Is it because the government is afraid of losing money? Or is it that the current Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) county commissioner just doesn't want to do it?
Personally, I think that after other counties and cities followed suit and organized water festivals around the most popular activity at the Ilan festival, it was to be expected that visitors would scatter to the different festivals, and that fewer people would come to Ilan.
The key question is how the Ilan government could have dealt with this. Now that Lu has announced he is putting an end to the festival, the key point comes to light -- there was no intention to continue to hold the festival. Without any intention, then of course there was no strong incentive or power to resolve the festival's difficulties.
As a citizen of Ilan, I want to tell the Ilan county commissioner that it would be a great waste of political capital if he were the person that put an end to the festival. He has the opportunity to take the festival in a whole new direction and to be the commissioner who could revive it by bringing out the local Ilan culture. He could be the one to replace an old dream with a new one.
Yu Ningkai is an Ilan native and a doctoral student at the National Chengchi University Graduate Institute of Taiwan History.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”
RSS