If the US State Department has a list of least favorite people, President Chen Shui-bian (
It could be that some State Department officials are so frustrated with Chen that they are pounding the table in their strategy rooms, complaining about the "trouble-maker," all the while scratching their heads and wondering why Chen is being so adamant this time in pushing for the referendum.
In case the US State Department hasn't realized, the answer is simple -- Chen is acting on behalf of the people of Taiwan.
As an elected president of a democratic country, Chen has the responsibility to look out for the best interests of the people of Taiwan.
And what are the people in Taiwan saying? A glance at recent polls tells it all.
A survey commissioned by the Institute for National Policy Research and conducted by the ERA Survey Research Center in June showed that more than 70 percent of participants supported the government's UN bid.
A separate survey carried out by the Taiwan Thinktank earlier this year suggested that more than 75 percent of Taiwanese expressed support for the idea of holding a referendum on the nation's UN bid.
More recently, a survey conducted by National Chengchi University's Election Study Center last week also found that more then 70 percent of the respondents supported a UN bid under the name "Taiwan."
Also, hundreds of thousands of signatures have been collected by the Democratic Progressive Party and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for their respective referendum proposals.
It is understood that the US has come under increasing pressure from China on the referendum issue. But what is China afraid of? Doesn't the Beijing administration often trumpet that China "places its hope in the people of Taiwan?" So what is there to fear in having the people of Taiwan raise their collective voice to tell the world what they want?
And why does the US -- the Big Brother promoter of democracy -- all of a sudden fail to understand that exercising this universal right is a hallmark of democracy?
In the Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV interview, Negroponte reiterated the US' friendship for Taiwan and Washington's support for Taiwan's democracy.
But what does it mean to "support Taiwan's democracy" and then work to the contrary and suppress Taiwanese from taking part in a referendum? What does it mean to "be Taiwan's friend" but then show disrespect for the decisions and will of that friend?
Sure, the US has its national interests to look after, but so does Taiwan. Chen, as the elected president, has the responsibility to work in the best interests of Taiwanese and continue to follow the people's call for the universal values of democracy and respect for human rights
After all, as two-time British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli put it: "I must follow the people. Am I not their leader?"
The US State Department should understand that it is not Chen who is being adamant in pushing the referendum, but Taiwanese themselves -- the true masters and stakeholders in the nation -- who are backing Chen up in the wish to exercise this universal right.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS