The US State Department spoke out in June in opposition to the proposed referendum on Taiwan's application to join the UN under the name "Taiwan."
Last month President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) wrote UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon a letter applying for UN membership.
During Chen's recent trip to Honduras for a summit with Central American leaders, he was punished by the US government, who only granted him a 50-minute refueling stop in distant Alaska.
Clearly, it is a strong indication of US displeasure with Chen's push for a nation-wide referendum on the government bid to join the UN under the name of Taiwan.
Taiwan is a democratic country and staunch ally of the US. Make no mistake: A referendum is a domestic affair and an integral part of the system that the US and other democratic countries hold dear. Then why does the US openly interfere with Taiwan's domestic affairs and democracy?
Washington fears that Chen's push for the referendum could test the patience of Beijing, which views it as a step toward formalizing de facto independence. Washington sees it as Chen provoking China. How can the US adopt this kowtow policy to China, a country without basic human rights?
As a signatory of the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, the US should recognize that since Japan renounced its ownership of Taiwan, the future of the country should be determined by the people who reside there.
Saying that a referendum is direct democracy which is a universal value that cannot be compromised, Chen stated, "The Taiwanese people will never accept someone drawing a red line for our democracy," and "We should not give up [the referendum] in exchange for better US transit treatment."
The message is loud and clear that for the 23 million people of Taiwan, nothing can replace their self-determination and democracy.
As the leader of the free world, it is time that the US stop opposing Taiwan's entry into the world body and stand up to support it wholeheartedly.
Gaines Ho
McLean, Virginia
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS