Earlier this month, the Government Information Office (GIO) announced a plan to launch an international TV channel to promote Taiwan as well as offer accurate information to the world on issues concerning Taiwan.
The move is understandable, as often international media coverage of Taiwan is tainted with "China-centric" sentiment generated by correspondents who write their stories about this country from their offices in Beijing.
But before the government ventures into this new project -- set to start next year with a budget of NT$2 billion -- it is advised to first look at its existing organizations that whether these Taiwanese missions abroad have effectively utilized their resources to promote Taiwan's stance and image to the world.
According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), the country has more than 50 missions in countries that do not have formal diplomatic ties with Taipei.
Referred to as the Taiwan Economic and Cultural Offices (TECOs), the missions are staffed with personnel dispatched by the ministry along with some staff from agencies such as the GIO, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Economic Affairs.
But how efficiently have these missions been serving Taiwan?
A quick look at the TECO Web sites reveals that a number of pages have not been updated for months. Some sites claim to offer downloadable information for Taiwanese expatriates, but the material couldn't be downloaded properly at all.
The poor maintenance and service of this very basic form of providing information leads one to wonder whether the taxpayers' money has gone to waste.
How can these missions transmit timely and correct information on issues concerning Taiwan to their host countries when they can't even provide decent service to Taiwanese expatriates and students living abroad?
These substandard services frequently make Taiwanese expatriates feel discouraged, frustrated and even betrayed by their own representatives. After these expatriates have gone all out to campaign for Taiwan's causes in their adopted countries, they see their own diplomats undermining their efforts by using such phrases as "we Chinese ... our Chinese culture" in their speeches.
Many vividly remember the unacceptable conduct from Taiwan's former representative to Singapore, Hu Wei-jen (
Hu's conduct sets a poor example for civil servants and constitutes a serious breach of protocol for any serving diplomat by disrespecting his own country.
One does not know how many diplomats like Hu are out there sabotaging Taiwan's national efforts under the cover of being a "diplomat," but so long as they are paid by taxpayers' money, they are subject to public scrutiny.
It is time to clean house, MOFA, and make the missions abroad more efficient and effective promoters of Taiwan.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath