The US "one China" policy is based on the Three Joint Communiques between China and the US and the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA). The communiques do not actually say that the US agrees Taiwan is a part of China. Neither does the TRA which is a piece of domestic legislation issued after the US severed diplomatic relations with the Republic of China (ROC) and recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC). It recognizes Taiwan as an existing entity, and does not say that Taiwan is a part of China.
The third clause of the third section of the TRA says that "The president is directed to inform the Congress promptly of any threat to the security or the social or economic system of the people on Taiwan ... The president and the Congress shall determine, in accordance with constitutional processes, appropriate action by the United States in response to any such danger." The third clause of the second section of the act points out that "The preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan are hereby reaffirmed as objectives of the United States." From this, we can see that the aim of the US' "one China" policy is protecting and enhancing the human rights of the people of Taiwan.
Beijing's "one China" principle on the other hand indicates that Taiwan is a part of China. China is in favor of "peaceful reunification" under "one country, two systems" on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. It has also adopted an "Anti-Secession" Law, threatening that "The state shall never allow the `Taiwan independence' secessionist forces to make Taiwan secede from China under any name or by any means."
De facto and de jure, Taiwan is not Chinese territory, and the Taiwanese have no obligation to unite with China. And yet China tries to force Taiwan into unification. This is an example of Chinese hegemonic ideology, and this behavior goes against the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In this way, Beijing is using its "one China" principle to try to oppress and obliterate the human rights of the Taiwanese, which means it is completely different from, and even contrary to, the US "one China" policy.
The current behavior of the US government seems to be moving away from the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the TRA. The US should abide by the universal values laid down in these documents and support the collective choice of the Taiwanese.
Wilson Chen is an honorary professor at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs