The recent elections for Japan's upper house and the current debate within the US Democratic Party have shown what the face of the post-Iraq War era will be like. This will be a time of "prioritizing life and sidelining politics."
Most analysts point to three reasons for the defeat of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in last Sunday's polls -- the ruling party was ineffective, its policy was overly focused on ideology and voters have rejected the style of the LDP's old-guard Cabinet. However, the key reason was Abe's Cabinet had turned its back on people's everyday needs to embrace empty slogans and money politics. Another factor was that the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), led by Ichiro Ozawa, provided a substantial new choice.
During the campaign, the biggest issue was the scandal over lost pension records. Other unpopular issues included raising consumption taxes, a widening wealth gap and educational reforms. When Abe came to power, none of these were addressed as energetically as political issues such as pushing for constitutional amendments, strengthening the military and joining the UN Security Council.
This is why the Mainichi Shimbun said that people had said "no" to Abe's political platform, which concentrated on ideology and ignored their daily lives.
The LDP old guard and corrupt, money-driven politics also mortally wounded Abe. Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, Abe lacked sufficient experience when he became prime minister. He is indecisive and uses people improperly; scandals are emerging from his Cabinet on an almost daily basis and money politics have been rampant in his administration.
In addition, with the collapse of the dominance that the LDP has enjoyed since 1955, there have been several elections in which a quasi two-party political system has gradually formed.
Although there isn't much difference between the DPJ and LDP in terms of policies and personalities, it was this strategy that allowed the DPJ to take so many votes from the LDP's traditional strongholds. The DPJ is becoming a new and reliable option, a key factor influencing the future of Japanese politics and elections.
But there is more to Abe's failure than just his inability to govern and people's aversion to money politics. The main reason is Abe has failed to grasp the structural changes in Japanese society -- an aging population, a growing wealth gap, the difficult circumstances of people living in rural areas, a lack of job security and problems with the national pension system. So when Ozawa played the "prioritize life" card while Abe ignored everyday concerns, the choice for voters was already clear.
The same problems are being debated in the US. In a recent Democratic Party presidential debate, while much of the focus was on Iraq, economic questions were still most important.
Jonathan Edwards proposed his "two Americas" concept to describe the serious wealth gap in US society today. There is a rich America, he says, and a poor America. When we talk about the wealth gap, we're not talking about the richest 20 percent compared with the poorest 80 percent, nor the richest 10 percent compared with the poorest 90 percent. We are talking about the incomes of the richest 0.1 percent versus the other 99.9 percent.
Statistics from the University of California, Berkeley, show that the richest 0.01 percent of US households have an average annual income of US$20 million. The top 0.1 percent of households had an average household income in 2005 of US$5.6 million. The combined income of this top 0.1 percent is approximately equivalent to the combined income of the lower 150 million people -- about half of the US' total population of 300 million. These are the "two Americas" that Edwards is talking about, and the so-called new wealth gap.
As globalization and capitalism have developed to the extent that they have today, the entangled political and economic structures and money politics have led most people to feel the pressure that a distorted social and economic environment puts on individuals. People need a solution to the problems of living and survival facing them.
If politicians aren't able to grasp this change, and instead insist on expending energy on ideologically motivated issues, sooner or later voters will turn their backs on them. Taiwan's politicians should take the Japanese and US examples as a lesson.
Philip Yang is a professor of political science at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Marc Langer
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused