The Taipei District Court's verdict in the embezzlement trial of former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Before the prosecutors indicted him on Feb. 13 for embezzling NT$11 million (US$333,000) from his special mayoral allowance during his terms as Taipei mayor, Ma repeatedly said that the special allowance was for work-related expenditures and that he had spent it on work-related affairs or used it to make donations to charities. He acknowledged he fully understood how the allowance should be used.
"I did it all according to the law," Ma said at the time. "I am scrupulous in separating public matters from private matters."
But once the case entered the courtroom, Ma appeared to change his tune. He told the court that it was his understanding that the special mayoral allowance was for the mayor's private use.
Does he really believe people forget so easily?
After the final court hearing on Monday, Ma again proclaimed his innocence, but said that he had not understood the legalities of the special mayoral allowance because its guidelines were promulgated in 1952, implying that he was only two years old at the time.
What an original defense. It goes a long way in explaining why Ma has never passed a bar exam -- there are, after all, so many laws that were written and enacted before he was born or when he was a child.
If Ma's argument stands, then perhaps many people now serving time should be freed since many parts of the Criminal Code were promulgated in 1935, long before these offenders were born -- or even their parents.
It is probably a good thing that Ma was elected KMT chairman in 2005 so that he could offer the public a true test of his leadership abilities for them to scrutinize before elevating him to the Presidential Office.
And although Ma has often portrayed himself as a party reformer, he proved a major disappointment to those who had pinned their hopes on him to get the party to turn over a new leaf. During his brief stint as chairman, Ma not only failed to erase the party's "black gold" reputation by returning the party's stolen assets, the KMT sold several companies and pieces of property for more than NT$14 billion.
Instead of raising the party's standards, he agreed to the amendment of its "black gold" exclusion clause so he could still run for president even if found guilty of corruption in his first trial. The clause, which barred KMT members indicted for crimes from running for office, now only applies to indicted members who have lost their final court appeal.
"Nothing so conclusively proves a man's ability to lead others as what he does from day to day to lead himself," IBM founder Thomas John Watson once said.
By this standard, Ma has shown himself not only unable to govern himself and his party but also hardly to be the "Mr Clean" so many people would like to lead the country.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with