Unveiling his eight reform policies on Sunday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma said it was important to respect and uphold the Constitution and lectured both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party for focusing too much on elections and not enough on constitutionality.
It is ironic to hear these comments from Ma, for it was under his watch as KMT chairman that the party did much to hinder the functioning of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Maybe Ma needs reminding that it was the KMT that refused to accept the president's nominations for the Control Yuan. As a result, this government watchdog, the brainchild of KMT co-founder Sun Yat-sen (
It was also the KMT that contravened the Budget Law (
In this way, Ma bested his predecessor's efforts at intransigence. Despite his well-known dislike for Chen, to whom he twice lost elections, former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
It is also the KMT that is this week pushing for the amendment of the Organic Law of the Central Election Commission (
But the most astonishing thing about this proposal is that it has been presented despite the Council of Grand Justices already ruling that such an arrangement is unconstitutional. A similar process was proposed by the KMT for the selection of members of the National Communications Commission, but the Council of Grand Justices concluded that this would deprive the Cabinet of its constitutional right to appoint officials.
Given all this, how can Ma criticize others for showing a lack of respect for the Constitution?
And if Ma believes that the Constitution does need to be amended -- and his actions suggest that he does -- then he should let the voters know what changes he has in mind, rather than proposing that they wait until two years of a presidential term have passed.
Ma's unwillingness to lay his cards on the table is well-documented, but this "wait and see" approach to the Constitution just eight months out from the presidential election appears to be nothing more than an electioneering tactic aimed at wooing both "deep-blue" supporters and swing voters.
If he hopes to take the helm of this country and try his hand at reshaping our Constitution, Ma would do well to heed the words of Benjamin Franklin, a man not unfamiliar with such documents, who noted that "Well done is better than well said."
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS