Unveiling his eight reform policies on Sunday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma said it was important to respect and uphold the Constitution and lectured both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party for focusing too much on elections and not enough on constitutionality.
It is ironic to hear these comments from Ma, for it was under his watch as KMT chairman that the party did much to hinder the functioning of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Maybe Ma needs reminding that it was the KMT that refused to accept the president's nominations for the Control Yuan. As a result, this government watchdog, the brainchild of KMT co-founder Sun Yat-sen (
It was also the KMT that contravened the Budget Law (
In this way, Ma bested his predecessor's efforts at intransigence. Despite his well-known dislike for Chen, to whom he twice lost elections, former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
It is also the KMT that is this week pushing for the amendment of the Organic Law of the Central Election Commission (
But the most astonishing thing about this proposal is that it has been presented despite the Council of Grand Justices already ruling that such an arrangement is unconstitutional. A similar process was proposed by the KMT for the selection of members of the National Communications Commission, but the Council of Grand Justices concluded that this would deprive the Cabinet of its constitutional right to appoint officials.
Given all this, how can Ma criticize others for showing a lack of respect for the Constitution?
And if Ma believes that the Constitution does need to be amended -- and his actions suggest that he does -- then he should let the voters know what changes he has in mind, rather than proposing that they wait until two years of a presidential term have passed.
Ma's unwillingness to lay his cards on the table is well-documented, but this "wait and see" approach to the Constitution just eight months out from the presidential election appears to be nothing more than an electioneering tactic aimed at wooing both "deep-blue" supporters and swing voters.
If he hopes to take the helm of this country and try his hand at reshaping our Constitution, Ma would do well to heed the words of Benjamin Franklin, a man not unfamiliar with such documents, who noted that "Well done is better than well said."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with