In May I attended the play Marat/Sade by Peter Weiss, performed by the students at the English Department of National Taiwan Normal University in Taipei. I was deeply impressed by the great passion and energy of those young actors and actresses.
The play reminded me of an important milestone in history, the French Revolution, when the French fought to escape the oppression of the aristocracy.
At the end of the play, Roux, a former priest and a radical socialist, shouts: "When will you learn to see? When will you learn to take sides? When will you show them?"
My heart was racing as I sat mesmorized. Yes, we have the freedom we wanted. Yet on the other hand, we have become enslaved by the overwhelming desire for money and power.
People chase wealth and fortune, organizations chase profit and growth, countries chase influence and power. In short, the whole world is locked up in a materialistic and capitalistic cage.
Hope is the mother of mankind. Ideals give us the essential driving force to continue writing our history. Nothing is more important than pursuing ideals.
Two months ago, during the French presidential elections, President Nicolas Sarkozy adopted the fresh ideas of others, claiming them as his own to garner votes. He gave the French the impression that he hoped to bring about a new era of prosperity for France, like Marat in the play.
Sarkozy's policy of immigration and national identity is obviously taken from France's right-wing National Front party; his affirmative action plans to counter racial discrimination on the job market, to fight against poverty and to protect the environment come from left-wing parties.
Sarkozy even brought four socialists onto his team, including Bernard Kouchner, a wellknown human rights campaigner who founded Doctors without Borders. Sarkozy also recommended Martin Hirsch, head of charity organization Emma, as high commissioner for poverty reduction.
The intriguing aspect of the election was that it highlighted the similarities between the country's ultranationalists and far-leftists, who otherwise expound wildly social views.
The ultranationalists want France to keep its economic independence, while the far-leftists reject blindly pushing for economic growth.
They argue that democracy, economic justice, environmental protection and human rights must be prioritized above purely economic concerns.
These parties deserve respect because they pursue ideals such as economic justice.
These core values are common ideals across the globe.
Taiwan is on the verge of a presidential election.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma has told business leaders he could raise the economic growth rate to at least 6 percent and raise per capita income to US$20,000 by 2011.
He said direct flights and shipping across the strait would become a reality in one year's time, with at least 10,000 Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan within four years, bringing in an estimated NT$60 billion (US$1.9 billion) a year. And with the gains this would entail for related sectors, Taiwan would earn NT$100 billion per year.
But let's put these tempting figures aside. If the nation only pays attention to monetary gains, it won't have much of a future.
We must keep the truth in mind. A country that allocates massive resources to pursue economic growth in the belief that it is the only way to survive the wave of globalization not only risks destroying its environment, but also destroying the social fabric that keeps social ills at bay.
Confucius recorded his utopian vision more than 2,000 years ago.
In the state he envisions, a sense of communal sharing replaces selfishness and materialism -- everyone respects and loves their parents and children as well as the parents and children of others.
Virtuous and worthy people are elected to public office and everybody plays an appropriate role in the family and society.
These noble ideals must be revived. I urge Taiwanese youth to devote their talent and energy to setting up and realizing these ideals and even to establish positive extremist politcal parties.
Sylvie Allassonniere
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath