Chiang Shih-hsiung (江世雄) said that although a Taiwanese declaration of independence is not a legal requirement for UN membership, it is a political necessity ("Why independence is a necessity," July 9, page 8). Most commentators would agree with Chiang's assessment. However, we cannot overlook the practical problem which soon arises.
Specifically, from what country is Taiwan to declare its independence? This is the problem which confronts the Taiwan independence supporters.
The Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, the formal Japanese surrender ceremonies -- none served to transfer the sovereignty of Taiwan to China. None of the Allies recognized any transfer of sovereignty on Oct. 25, 1945, the date of the Japanese surrender ceremonies in Taiwan.
In the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan renounced all claim and title over Taiwan, but China was not designated as the receiving country. The Treaty of Taipei gave full recognition to those arrangements.
Hence there are no international legal documents which can definitively show that China -- whether the People's Republic of China or the Republic of China -- holds the territorial sovereignty of Taiwan.
Have any of the Taiwan Independence groups found a solution to this problem?
Roger Lin
Taipei
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations