Wed, Jul 04, 2007 News Editorials 525719961 visits
 Photo News
 More Editorials
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
 
 Community Compass
 
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    John Tkacik on Taiwan: The myth of china lending a hand

    By John Tkacik

    Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007, Page 8

    `The least little gesture by China is seized upon as evidence of China lending a hand when the reality invariably is China biting a hand.'

    I was a US diplomat in Beijing in 1979 when the US normalized relations with China and have been involved in China affairs ever since. I therefore take issue with "China Lends a Hand," an article published in the Washington Post by my former boss, Richard Holbrooke.

    Holbrooke said China "lent a hand" in North Korea, Sudan and Myanmar. In reality, it was more like "China bites a hand."

    On Korea: The Feb. 13 Beijing "joint statement" on North Korean denuclearization said nothing about Pyongyang currency counterfeiting or US sanctions.

    Yet China demanded the US unfreeze US$24 million in North Korea's Macau bank accounts or the Beijing government would go public that US inflexibility -- not North Korea's criminal activity -- was the cause of Pyongyang's refusal to comply with the "statement."

    On Sudan: The international outcry against China's support for Sudan's genocidal regime did prompt Beijing to dispatch Chinese Ambassador Zhai Jun (翟雋) to Khartoum in early April. When Zhai returned, he told the Chinese and foreign press that the region is "basically stable," refugee camps had good sanitary conditions, aid groups functioned normally and the "situation is in fact improving."

    When Zhai was asked specifically about the Sudanese government helicopter gunships that had supported the Janjaweed as they razed villages and massacred villagers in Darfur, he said: "I don't know anything about helicopter gunships."

    When National Public Radio correspondent Mary Kay Magistad asked whether he believed the Sudanese government was not supporting the Janjaweed, he said: "I didn't say anything about support -- I haven't asked them anything about this, and if they were supporting them, they wouldn't tell me."

    Just a few days earlier, Chinese Defense Minister Cao Gangchuan (曹剛川) had told his Sudanese counterpart Beijing was "willing to further develop cooperation between the two militaries in every sphere."

    What does China really say about Darfur?

    On the same day as Zhai's press conference, the China Daily wrote: "Harsh demands have been made of Sudan but little respect has been shown for the country -- one of the largest on the African continent. As a sovereign nation, Sudan, which learned bitter lessons during the colonial years, aspires to territorial integrity, national unity, ethnic reconciliation and regional peace and stability."

    And that was it.

    On Myanmar: Little comfort should be taken from US diplomats' talks with Burmese officials in Beijing about the nearly two-decade incarceration of Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi.

    Last year, the US Department of State told Congress that when Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) visited Yangon, "he emphasized the need for Burma to have a more inclusive political process." That would have been nice if it were true. In reality, China praised Myanmar for "continu[ing] to advance the process of national reconciliation." That was all.

    Last year, then deputy secretary of state Robert Zoellick also told a congressional panel that "some of you might have seen there was a report by the new foreign minister of Hamas [Mahmoud al-Zahar] for the Palestinian government sort of saying he was going to go to China. I raised this with the Chinese promptly. Within two days, the Chinese said `we didn't invite him.'"

    Zoellick portrayed Beijing's quick response and "non-invitation" of al-Zahar as the "foundations of the type of discussion with China about the types of mutual interest that we can have and work together."

    Of course, the Chinese lied to him. China indeed had invited al-Zahar. A senior Israeli "involved in Chinese affairs," who spoke on condition of anonymity, told me that because Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) was about to visit Washington, the Chinese foreign ministry decided "it was inconvenient" to admit to the Hamas invitation.

    Al-Zahar had a wonderful time in Beijing, by the way.

    "On a bilateral relationship, yes, it was successful," al-Zahar said. "I met the minister of foreign affairs [Li Zhaoxing, 李肇星] ... we discussed everything; we addressed our political attitudes."

    That was June 2 last year.

    As I write this, on June 29 last year, Hamas kidnapped an Israeli soldier on the Gaza border, sparking an Israeli retaliation attack. Chinese-made weapons have also been used by militants against armies in the Middle East, including Israel's.

    What does this prove? That most US government officials and "opinion elites" -- like Holbrooke -- are wont to engage in wishful thinking when it comes to China. The least little gesture by China is seized upon as evidence of "China lending a hand" when the reality invariably is "China biting a hand."

    John Tkacik is a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.
    This story has been viewed 1612 times.

  • Advertising