The death last week of a fifth elderly farmer from heat stroke this summer has focused attention on the hard lives of many rural dwellers. But it has also highlighted another looming issue -- the future of Taiwan's food supply.
As the nation continues along its seemingly never-ending path of development-at-all-costs, few people give a second thought to who will be growing rice or picking bananas once the current crop of increasingly elderly farmers call it a day.
Around 50 percent of the nation's approximately 530,000 farmers are now 55 or older, while 9 percent are over 65.
Looking after these people is key, because while Taiwan relies on millions of LCD TVs, notebook computers and microchips to keep its economy ticking over, the people who design and manufacture these products also need the carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals provided by the grain, fruit and vegetables grown by farmers.
How the nation will cope in 20 or even 10 years after many of these elderly farmers have passed away is an extremely important question, because the "strawberry generation" of well-educated, privileged youngsters are unwilling to toil among the muck and flies to eke out a living.
With profits from farming becoming smaller -- not helped by entry into the WTO and competition from heavily subsidized US and EU farm products -- it is hardly surprising that young people would rather work in cities.
But the nation cannot afford further inaction on this issue because food security is a tremendously important issue. It is not possible to rely solely on increasing food imports. In the event of a cross-strait conflict a blockade of the nation's ports is one of the tactics China could feasibly employ.
Domestic solutions must therefore be found and found fast.
The government must act to replace the current crop of farmers with a younger generation and prevent a lot of vital agricultural knowledge and skills from going to the grave.
Large-scale employment of foreign agricultural workers is not a practical alternative as most farms are family concerns and are not big enough to warrant it.
While exporting produce to more lucrative markets like Japan and Australia -- where farmers can make more money for their produce -- is one avenue being exploited, this alone will not entice young people back to the land.
The Council of Agriculture has begun programs to attract young people to farming and it obviously understands that recreational farms, value-added farm produce and improved mechanization are desperately needed to make farming more profitable and easier for elderly farmers.
But the council and the government need to redouble their efforts and put even more resources into these programs if they are to have any success in reducing the average age of farmers and making a life in the fields an attractive proposition.
They have to be more creative because raising the monthly stipend for elderly farmers by NT$1,000 before every election will not solve anything.
One would think that the Democratic Progressive Party government -- which relies on such hard-working people for crucial votes -- would not need to be reminded of the need to solve these problems and ensure that farmers can enjoy some semblance of a comfortable retirement.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US