Taiwan's representative to Singapore Hu Wei-jen (
Put aside incredulity that an esteemed institution like Harvard might have room for someone who casually violates his responsibilities. The main problem is that Hu has failed his basic duty by placing personal opinion above the national interest. Not only does this violate professional ethics, it is also embarrassing for the government and damaging to Taiwan's interests.
Moreover, his behavior sets a poor example for other diplomatic officials. He should have resigned a lot earlier if his political ideals were so incompatible with those of the elected government.
Hu's claims about his employment also don't mesh with the facts. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs told him in April that he was to be moved. During that time the ministry considered sending former chief of the general staff Lee Tien-yu (
Hu is the son of Army General Hu Tsung-nan (
But the DPP has treated him well. After the party came to power in 2000, Hu was allowed to remain deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council, and later appointed Taiwan's representative to Germany before transferring to Singapore.
This seems to mean nothing to Hu Wei-jen, whose actions were a deliberate attempt to humiliate the DPP government and thereby curry favor with the KMT -- presumably to improve his chances of acquiring a post of influence for himself if the KMT wins next year's presidential election.
Hu Wei-jen's behavior constitutes a serious breach of protocol. The ministry should do more than just mumble about "regretting" the incident.
After Hu Wei-jen returns to Taiwan, Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (
The interests of the country are more important than those of any individual or party. Demeaning a government, a country and its people is a line that no one in the foreign service may cross.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength