Since naming former premier Vincent Siew (
Ma has stated that he wants to make the economy the main issue of the presidential election -- the obvious rationale for choosing technocrat Siew -- and has declared the independence versus unification debate that has dominated Taiwanese politics over the last few years a "fake" issue.
So far, so good. Ma has pulled out all the stops to ensure the spotlight remains firmly on economic affairs, with his campaign activities frequently releasing plans for Taiwan's economy combined with speeches at various economic bodies and forums.
Ma is making an early effort to frame the debate and take the lead in deciding which issues will be discussed in the build-up to next March's election.
By doing so, he is also trying to divert attention from his biggest weakness -- his stance on Taiwan's status -- because Ma is fully aware that his view that Taiwan is part of China, in his case the Republic of China, is a potential election-losing issue.
Ma knows that his and the KMT's stated preference for eventual unification puts them at odds with a growing number of Taiwanese who do not identify with China and the majority who prefer to maintain the "status quo."
But while the vast number of Taiwanese are content with this -- for now -- practical way of dealing with the cross-strait conundrum, it is quite obvious that China is not at all content.
Beijing would not be continuing its relentless acquisition of advanced weaponry, quite clearly aimed at one day forcing Taiwan to acquiesce to its demands, if it was happy with waiting another few decades as Ma has suggested doing.
In fact one could argue that the independence-unification issue is the only thing on China's mind. It holds the importance of the "return of Taiwan" above all else.
The threat two years ago by a Chinese major general to strike US cities with nuclear weapons in the event of any US intervention in a cross-strait conflict and the 1,000 missiles Beijing has pointing at Taiwan shows how seriously many in China take this issue.
Therefore, it is going to be extremely difficult for Ma to avoid talking about it at some point.
The independence-unification issue is, unfortunately for Ma, not something that can be swept under the carpet so easily and he is being naive if he thinks he can keep the focus off it during the nine-month campaign.
Because like it or not, China is the biggest threat to Taiwan's future, and whether the subject is health, education, agriculture, tourism, diplomacy, participation in the international community, defense or the economy, the shadow of China and the difficulties of cross-strait policy connected to these issues looms menacingly in the background.
None of these subjects can be properly discussed without considering Taiwan's relations with China and therefore the sovereignty issue is bound to crop up sooner or later. This is the major flaw in Ma's strategy.
It will take an intense effort on behalf of the Ma camp and no small amount of political skill for him to avoid the sovereignty issue.
But then he has shown in the past how, if given the chance, he can manipulate the media to keep the focus off awkward situations and embarrassing problems.
He enjoyed reasonable success in this regard on the day he was indicted by simultaneously announcing his presidential bid.
But whatever transpires during the election build-up, Ma still has a very good chance of winning next year, partly because of his personal popularity and partly because of the changeovers that periodically occur in every two-party democracy.
But in order to stay the course and not jeopardize his victory chances, Ma must avoid getting cornered on the independence-unification issue, keeping his personal belief and that of his party locked far away from public scrutiny.
This will be a big ask, but he has given himself a head start by beginning the race early and on his own terms. Democratic Progressive Party candidate Frank Hsieh (
But in his haste to take the initiative Ma must be careful not to reveal too much of his hand too early, as doing so will provide a wily campaigner like Hsieh with the ammunition to fully expose any shortcomings in Ma's agenda and shoot down his presidential dream.
Richard Hazeldine is a writer based in Taipei.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS