With the Cabinet's approval of a national languages development draft law, language policy in Taiwan made a breakthrough in the law's twin goals of "localization and internationalization," and the first has already been achieved. Internationalization is the next step.
Taiwan is an island with multiple languages and cultures. After the Japanese era, Taiwanese, Hakka and Aboriginal languages were suppressed by the powerful Chinese authorities, and some nearly died out completely. The draft law can help revive them. It's not related to independence; it's just sensible language policy.
With greater economic development, internationalization has become the focus.
Many people study English because it is a global language. Chinese is now gaining ground.
The Taiwanese government should adjust its language strategy with practical measures.
English is a second language in Hong Kong and Singapore, but people in both cities can still speak Chinese well. They are good examples for Taiwan.
The draft law is a great start to the "localization" goal. But localization and internationalization are both important. And the policy makers should seek correct language policy instead of votes.
Henry Wu
Kaohsiung
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
RSS