Since Taiwan's Aborigines startedetheir name rectification campaign, a series of social reform projects aimed at decolonization and stronger self awareness have been initiated. Campaigns have begun to restore tribal names, revive native languages, return land ownership and re-establish self rule.
When the government responded to the name restoration campaign by changing the name of Chiehshou Road (介壽路) to Ketagalan Boulevard on March 21, 1996, it was the first symbolic act of good will by a Han Chinese-dominated government.
A few days ago, however, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) forced a decision through the Taipei City Council to change the name of Ketagalan Boulevard -- the first road in an urban area of Taiwan to be named after an Aboriginal tribe -- to Anti-Corruption Democracy Square.
In addition to strongly opposing this act of spiritual violence and neglect of Aboriginal dignity, we demand that the Taipei City Government immediately rescind this measure and apologize to all Taiwan's Aborigines. We also express regret that the Taipei City Government's Indigenous Peoples' Commission did not oppose this violation of Aboriginal dignity during the City Council meeting.
The Ketagalan tribe lives in the Taipei basin. Despite the fact that Ketagalan families still live in many of the old tribal areas, they have been forgotten or ignored by successive colonial governments since the Japanese era.
The new rulers that arrived after World War II perpetuated the colonial policies of the Japanese government and gave the land Chinese names. In Aboriginal areas, the government was influenced by Chinese ideology while naming places, and Aboriginal townships were given names based on old Chinese moral standards, such as benevolence and love in Jenai Township (仁愛鄉), trust and righteousness in Hsinyi Township (信義鄉), harmony and peace in Hoping Township (和平鄉) or the ideal Confucian commonwealth in Tatung Township (大同鄉).
Other names were based on the Three Principles of the People, such as nationalism in Mintsu Village (民族村), democracy in Minchuan Village (民權村) and livelihood in Minsheng Village (民生村), all in Sanmin Township (三民鄉), or on restoration as in Fuhsing Township (復興鄉) and retrocession in Kuangfu Township (光復鄉), self-strengthening and so on, thus attempting to bury the old names forever.
Today's government under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has failed to implement transitional justice and to restore the old names of these places. The party has not implemented Article Four of the "New Partnership Between the Indigenous Peoples and the Government of Taiwan" signed by President Chen Shui-bian (
The name change from Chiehshou to the name of a Taipei-based Aboriginal tribe, the Ketagalan, was a symbol of respect for the status of Taiwan's Aborigines and a good beginning on the road toward ethnic conciliation. A heavy shadow, however, has been cast over this very important symbol by Hau through his politically motivated move aimed at the pan-green camp.
This move shatters the symbolic significance of using the Ketagalan name. Not only does it show a deep ignorance of Taiwan's past, but it is also the most idiotic move in Taiwanese ethnic politics of recent years.
We strongly condemn this use of Aboriginal dignity as a pawn on the political battlefield of the Han Chinese people and sacrifice of the Ketagalan in the name of Chiang Kai-shek (
Isak Afo is spokesperson of the Taiwan Indigenous Association.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
RSS