Fresh from a visit to China, the new commander of US military forces in the Pacific said he found Chinese military leaders intensely interested in acquiring aircraft carriers. At the same time, Admiral Timothy Keating said: "I suggested let's not be naive about the complexity of those ships, and they are not cheap."
The admiral, a naval aviator who has made 1,200 carrier landings, said all the Chinese leaders with whom he spoke during a five day stay earlier this month indicated their inclination to pursue the development of aircraft carriers.
No one said "we're not going to do this," he said in an interview at his Pacific Command headquarters overlooking Pearl Harbor.
Keating declined to speculate on when China might start building a carrier but said it took the US Navy, even with the most extensive experience in the world, more than a decade to design, build, equip with aircraft, and train air and ship crews. This would be a profoundly difficult venture if the Chinese chose to undertake it, he said.
In 1954, at the height of the transition from propeller aircraft to jets, the US Navy experienced nearly 800 plane crashes. Even as late as 1999, the Navy lost 22 planes flown by the world's most experienced aviators.
Internal discussion and external speculation over China's acquisition of an aircraft carrier has been churning along for at least 25 years but now seems to have picked up momentum. Keating said he sensed that, just below the surface, the Chinese saw aircraft carriers as potent symbols of great power status, a clear Chinese aspiration.
The US Pacific commander also made a point cited by several predecessors cautioning his hosts not to misjudge US military capacity or intentions. He urged that both Chinese and Americans take all necessary measures to avoid miscalculation or misunderstanding.
We were not bellicose about it, he said. Rather, he said let's make sure we don't get into situations where there would be recourse to military force.
An early Chinese advocate of aircraft carriers was Admiral Liu Huaqing (
To modernize our national defense and build a perfect weaponry and equipment system, the admiral once wrote, we cannot but consider the development of aircraft carriers.
So far, the Chinese navy has concentrated on buying submarines from the Russians or building them. That policy, however, will most likely not last much longer, said Andrew Erickson and Andrew Wilson, of the US Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island. While submarines seem to be ascendant, they wrote last fall, the Chinese are still actively engaged with the carrier question and are reframing the debate.
Five reasons come to mind as to why China could build an aircraft carrier: international prestige, power projection (especially in the South China Sea), defending lifelines (especially for oil passing through the Strait of Malacca between the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea), regional rivalries (especially with competitors India and Japan, who have better sea power), and relief operations (such as the 2004 tsunami in the Indian Ocean).
China would not need a carrier to attack Taiwan, as land-based aircraft and missiles would make up the brunt of an assault.
The Chinese have bought four decommissioned carriers since 1985; the Melbourne from Australia and the Minsk, Kiev, and Varyag from Russia. The three former Russian ships are tied up and open to the public as educational museums. What the Chinese have learned from those ships can only be speculated.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused