Late on May 11, I left for Geneva, Switzerland, with officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Overseas Chinese Affairs Commission. We were setting out to try to win acceptance for Taiwanese membership in the WHO.
This was the third time during my term as director of the Department of Health that I participated in the struggle with the World Health Assembly (WHA). This year, we applied for full WHO membership under the name "Taiwan," which made the debate on Taiwan's bid, in which two of our allies spoke on the nation's behalf against two of China's allies, even more complicated than in the past. Although Taiwan's media prefer to emphasize the outcome of the General Assembly vote -- 148 to 17 -- I feel that the results of this year's effort were far more significant than in the past.
Taiwan has attempted to obtain WHA observer status for 10 years, so this is not a new issue. At the WHA meeting on May 14, however, health ministers or representatives from 182 countries, UN agencies, major non-governmental organizations, as well as major international media outlets, more than 2000 people in all, spent more than three hours debating in depth whether Taiwan should be given WHO membership.
During these three hours, ministers or representatives of Taiwan's diplomatic allies spoke, and ministers or representatives of the US, Japan, Canada, Germany, Russia, India and other countries gave attentive thought to the positive and negative aspects of Taiwanese WHO membership as they listened to representatives of almost 50 countries discussing Taiwan's position.
Never in international medical circles has such careful consideration and such open and balanced debate been dedicated to Taiwan's international status or its medical contributions to developing countries.
Although China had mobilized supporters like Cuba and Pakistan to issue statements blocking Taiwanese membership and less than half the final vote was cast in support of Taiwan, representatives of many developed countries stated openly after the vote that they supported Taiwan's right to participation and representation in the WHA.
After the meeting, they also praised and congratulated Taiwan. Although Taiwan still hasn't won the support of a majority of member states, almost all representatives of individual countries support the idea that there should be opportunities for communication, contacts and cooperation between Taiwan and the WHO.
Taiwan's efforts to obtain meaningful participation have also been given the support of many countries, but pressure from China has made some countries reticent to openly support Taiwan's direct and immediate cooperation with the WHO, not to mention membership.
The WHO membership application may be Taiwan's most important moment in the international limelight each year, but Taiwan's medical professionals never cease to see the attempts to become a contributor to international health as a duty and an honor. The best example of this attitude is the Taiwan International Health Action, which was established last year.
Although the curtain has fallen on this year's WHA, Taiwan's medical professionals and the public at large will continue to move forward, manifesting the concern of the Taiwanese people and the professionalism and advancement of Taiwan's health professionals by sharing this concern and professionalism with people around the world, while at the same time working for Taiwan's acceptance into the WHO next year.
Hou Sheng-mou is the minister of the Department of Health.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry