The National Communications Commission (NCC), in fining SET-TV NT$1 million (US$30,000) for airing a 228 Incident documentary that contained erroneous archival footage, has shown that it cannot be trusted to conduct its affairs in an impartial, let alone intelligible, fashion.
Its partisan decision amounts to an attack on freedom of speech -- in the sense that it intimidates media workers and program producers into a level of perfection that approaches the fantastic. No longer, it seems, is there the freedom to make mistakes that can be atoned for by an apology, a promise to do better and a damaged reputation.
This chilling effect could turn out to be pronounced. The media make mistakes all the time in a variety of contexts. This inexactitude is an unfortunate fact of life for an industry with little time to maneuver. The question that follows in this brave new era is which mistakes will be picked up, by whom and for what political purposes.
If each of the nation's media organizations -- regardless of political leaning -- are now to be held to this standard, we can expect a big increase in the number of incidents resulting in fines.
It is not clear if the NCC's members have any concept of precedent. If they do, then their actions are a sinister throwback to a less liberal era and should be opposed by all media outlets. If they do not, then they are a sad joke and the agency should be addressed as such at every available opportunity.
When the Government Information Office's role in monitoring the media was taken away, there were high -- perhaps naive -- hopes that the replacement would be a truly independent force, free of unreasonable influence from all political parties.
Instead, the NCC is a politically partisan body because it is made up of people appointed by the parties in proportion to the number of seats each party has in the legislature. It therefore cannot be trusted to make judgments on media matters with the public as its primary interest, and even less so when media outlets attempt to address sensitive political matters.
The NCC has been declared an unconstitutional body by the Council of Grand Justices, though for reasons only understood by the justices themselves it has been allowed to continue operations and will do for some time until the law is changed.
The NCC's stupidity offers stark evidence of what will happen if the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) continues with its campaign to turn the Central Election Commission -- and any other body that requires expertise and independence to function properly -- into partisan agencies.
And this is, indeed, yet another reminder that the ideological nature of the KMT has not changed since Taiwan democratized, and that many of its fellow travelers in academia and elsewhere are ready to turn back the clock as soon as a chance presents itself. Democracy, non-partisan institutions of state, due process: These terms are of no value to the hardliners that run the KMT except when used as political slogans.
Appointees to the NCC who respect the principles of independence and separation of powers should quit and let the body conduct its affairs in an even more transparently biased and inept fashion. Those who stay and lend it the facade of a balanced executive agency will only further injure their credibility.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS