Spent tea leaves were etched into the raw blisters on his face when they found him. Villagers believe the urn of scalding tea the Burmese soldiers tipped over Mu Kay's head killed him. But the betel nut farmer, 57, more likely bled to death, shot point-blank in both thighs.
He died in agony. The 150 soldiers who surprised the remote hamlet waited over his dying body for two days before leaving. When the villagers emerged from hiding they buried him in a shallow grave and left their homes for good.
The farmer's grim death is not unique. Many have been slain in the Myanmar regime's biggest military offensive in a decade -- all under the guise of "development," to clear the way for four vast hydro-power dams that began more than a year ago.
It is the latest bloody chapter in the world's longest running civil war that has lasted nearly 60 years and sent millions fleeing into Thailand. The conflict also displaced 500,000 people in Myanmar. But the newest offensive, out of sight in the jungle, is driven by the junta's aim to control resource-rich eastern Myanmar by enslaving some villages and destroying others -- killing, forcibly relocating or driving out the inhabitants.
The prize is a bonanza of foreign currency from gems, gold, logging and hydro-electricity that will bolster the repressive regime. The largest and most lucrative project is a series of four dams on the Salween river generating cheap power, mostly for export to Thailand.
"The regime uses development as an excuse for clearance," said Mark Farmaner of the UK-based advocacy group the Burma Campaign. "The generals say these are `development projects,' but they're cash projects. They invest massively in things like the dams and the revenues go straight to the dictatorship."
In the past year, the Thailand Burma Border Consortium that works in the refugee camps estimates troops destroyed 232 villages in the country's east and drove 82,000 from their homes. It is one development-driven conflict highlighted in a report this week by Christian Aid, Human Tide: The Real Migration Crisis, which predicts another 1 billion people will be driven from their homes worldwide between now and 2050 as climate change joins and exacerbates conflicts, natural disasters and development projects.
This week eight British members of parliament are visiting the Thailand-Myanmar border to assess the UK's Department for International Development's efforts for refugees and those displaced by years of fighting.
Myanmar's army adopts grisly tactics to extend its writ. Villagers are given just days to move to "relocation sites" in ceasefire areas where ethnic rebel groups have signed peace pacts.
They are often forced to build roads unpaid. Remote villages of no military value are shelled and torched and their rice stores are destroyed. Landmines are sown on farm tracks.
Villagers encountering army patrols in "black zones," where the Karen National Union holds sway, are shot on sight, or worse.
"The soldiers torture them," said Naw Ler Htoo of the Karen Teachers' Working Group that trains in the camps. "They cut off the ears and cut out their eyes. Then they leave their bodies, to terrorize the other villagers."
Naw Phaw Phaw, 34, suffered the military's wrath. Struggling since her husband was killed three years ago by a landmine, she was forced to flee when her village in Karen state's Papun district was razed in March.
"They burned down all 10 houses and the three rice stores," she said, nursing her son and daughter.
"The KNU still controls the area and warned troops were near, so it might be dangerous," she said. "We left immediately and came back to find everything destroyed. We stayed for a few weeks, but it was impossible. There was nothing to eat and we left."
An estimated 95,000 people teeter on the brink of starvation in Myanmar, hiding in the jungle. The ranks of refugees in camps in Thailand have swelled to 153,000. Naw Phaw Phaw staggered into Ee Thu Hta camp exhausted and hungry late last month.
The camp was set up by the Karen authorities a year ago when Thailand blocked new refugees. Bamboo shelters house 3,000, but there is no electricity or running water. The camp squats next to the Salween river on the border with Thailand. There are three Myanmar military posts within two hours' walk, leading to constant fear of attack.
Damming the Salween for hydro-power has been the focus of countless studies over the years. But a flurry of agreements signed by Chinese and Thai companies over the past 18 months moved preparations into top gear.
They spell the end for the Salween as south-east Asia's last free-flowing large river.
Details of the projects remain secret.But the Salween Watch pressure group says work started last month on a hydro-power plant and dam at Tasang in central Shan state, where an offensive between 1996 and 1999 displaced 380,000 people. Myanmar's government and the Thai power producer MDX in April last year signed a ?3 billion (US$5.9 billion) deal to build the 7,110-megawatt project, with most power destined for Thailand to feed a prospective Asian grid.
Thai academics also recently conducted an environmental impact assessment study, guarded by Myanmar's soldiers at the southern-most Hat Gyi dam site, a ?500 million, 600-megawatt project due to start in months and funded by the state-owned Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand and a Chinese firm, Sinohydro.
But areas around two other dam sites at Wei Gyi and Dar Gwin remain beyond Myanmar's control. The army is focusing its 61 battalions on killing, subjugating or driving out the population to guarantee the contractors' safety.
The flooding of vast areas will drive another 73,000 people from their land in Myanmar and 10,000 in Thailand. Environmentalists say the Salween's ecosystem will be devastated, jeopardizing 235 animal species. But the biggest fear is for the populace.
"These dam projects will just mean more and more forced labor, either on roads or the construction itself," Nay Tha Blay of Karen Rivers Watch said. "Yet the Karen people will get no benefit from the dams. Only the [State Peace and Development Council] will get the money and the Thais the cheap electricity to sell to the rest of Asia."
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
The Ministry of the Interior late last month released its report on homes that consumed low amounts of electricity in the second half of last year, offering a glimpse of the latest data on “vacant houses” — homes using less than 60 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. The report showed that Taiwan had 914,196 vacant houses, or a vacancy rate of 9.79 percent, up from 9.32 percent in the first half of last year and the highest since 2008, when it was 9.81 percent. Of the nation’s 22 administrative areas, Lienchiang County (Matsu) had the highest vacancy rate at 17.4
RSS